Skip to main content

Security report for managramatvede.lv

Mana Grāmatvede - Tava Uzņēmuma burvju nūjiņa · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mana Grāmatvede is a Latvian-based accounting service provider offering professional and customized outsourced accounting solutions to small and medium-sized enterprises. The website presents a clear business focus on full-cycle accounting, payroll calculations, and tax consulting services, targeting Latvian businesses seeking reliable financial management support. The company positions itself as a trusted partner enabling clients to focus on growth and development. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Rank Math SEO and CookieYes for cookie consent management, hosted on Closte infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service pages. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching managramatvede.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, specifically in outsourced accounting and payroll services. Its business model revolves around providing tailored accounting solutions to Latvian SMEs, helping them maintain financial transparency and compliance. The website features customer testimonials indicating positive client relationships and trust. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests reliance on contact forms for lead generation. The use of modern SEO and cookie consent tools indicates awareness of digital marketing and privacy regulations. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned. The company appears to be a small-sized entity focused on local market penetration with a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The lack of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, which could impact trustworthiness in case of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by adding security headers and comprehensive privacy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy page linked prominently on the website.
  3. Add terms of service and security incident response policies to improve legal compliance and trust.
  4. Provide explicit company contact emails and phone numbers to facilitate direct communication.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mana Grāmatvede - Tava Uzņēmuma burvju nūjiņa
Description
Mana grāmatvede sniedz profesionālu un individuāli pielāgotu grāmatvedības atbalstu, ļaujot uzņēmumiem koncentrēties uz to izaugsmi un attīstību.
Key services
Ikdienas grāmatvedība, Algu aprēķini, Nodokļu konsultācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, CookieYes Consent, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, Rank Math SEO, LiteSpeed Cache
Frameworks
Gutenberg Blocks
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information only via contact form; no emails or phone numbers explicitly found.
  6. Website uses WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools.
  7. Google Analytics used for visitor tracking with cookie duration disclosed.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Content is business-focused, targeting Latvian SMEs for accounting services.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is present and valid.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using PHP and jQuery, enhanced with plugins like Rank Math SEO for search engine optimization and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by Closte, inferred from CDN URLs. The site uses Google Fonts and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg blocks for layout and styling. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy/legal pages, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the business needs, with opportunities for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with managramatvede.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review managramatvede.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.