Skip to main content

Security report for managewithstack.com

STACK · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

STACK is a specialized SaaS provider delivering curated software solutions tailored for healthcare organizations, particularly pharmacies and associations. The platform focuses on operational needs such as accreditation, licensing, compliance, and asset management, positioning itself as a unique vertical healthcare ecosystem. The company targets healthcare professionals seeking streamlined business operations and compliance management. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates analytics and scheduling tools, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CAPTCHA protections, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some risk regarding domain legitimacy, but the website content and business information appear professional and trustworthy overall.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching managewithstack.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

STACK operates in the healthcare SaaS market with a niche focus on pharmacies and associations, providing asset management and compliance software. Its business model revolves around vertical SaaS offerings with embedded analytics and vendor connectivity. The company demonstrates a clear market position as the only vertical SaaS healthcare ecosystem for its target sectors. Contact information and social media presence support credibility. The partnership with OnQueue.io suggests an ecosystem approach. Growth potential exists given the specialized market and professional focus. However, the lack of publicly available domain registration data may warrant further due diligence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CAPTCHA on its contact form, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent mechanism or explicit GDPR compliance indicators. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a detailed privacy policy and security policy with incident response contacts.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to improve legitimacy and trust.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
STACK
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
STACK
Description
Curated software for healthcare organizations, focused on accreditation, licensing, and compliance
Key services
Asset management software, Accreditation and licensing compliance, Single Sign-On (SSO) support, Vendor connectivity, Embedded analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Gravity Forms, Calendly widget, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress theme Azure Basic Child
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare SaaS solutions for pharmacies and associations.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  6. Website uses modern technologies and standard WordPress plugins.
  7. Security headers are not detected; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data found.
  9. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using a child theme of Azure Basic, leveraging common plugins such as Gravity Forms for contact forms and Strong Testimonials for customer feedback. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and Calendly for scheduling demos. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains and uses FontAwesome for icons. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites, with opportunities to enhance security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with managewithstack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review managewithstack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.