Skip to main content

Security report for manaaptieka.lv

manaaptieka.lv · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

manaaptieka.lv is a Latvian online platform focused on providing pharmacy-related information including medicine availability, products, and health articles. It serves the general public seeking accessible and reliable pharmacy data. The website is built on WordPress CMS and employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and tracking tools like Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and mobile optimization, ensuring a positive user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though lacks explicit security headers and public security policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website's content and structure suggest a legitimate healthcare service provider. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR cookie consent requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching manaaptieka.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically targeting pharmacy customers in Latvia. It provides a service model centered on information dissemination and search functionality for pharmacies and medicines. The platform leverages social media presence on Facebook to engage users. While no direct contact information or detailed company registration data is available on the site, the structured data and cookie consent indicate a responsible approach to user privacy. The business appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a focus on local market needs. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the available data.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent framework that respects user privacy and GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not publicly disclose incident response or security policies, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of third-party tracking pixels is balanced with user consent mechanisms, reflecting a moderate level of privacy awareness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security communication.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
manaaptieka.lv
Description
Online platform related to pharmacies, medicine availability, products, and articles.
Key services
Pharmacy search, Medicine availability, Health-related articles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, PixelYourSite, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and tracking.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user control.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  7. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel for frontend functionality. It integrates PixelYourSite for marketing and tracking, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads multiple fonts and scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. SEO is managed via Rank Math plugin with structured JSON-LD data embedded for organization and webpage metadata. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and accessible search functionality. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with manaaptieka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review manaaptieka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.