Skip to main content

Security report for mampaey.com

Mampaey · Energy · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mampaey Offshore Industries is a global market leader specializing in integrated mooring, berthing, and towing solutions for the maritime and offshore industries. The company emphasizes safety and efficiency, offering state-of-the-art products and integrated information systems. It operates under the parent company Trelleborg Group, indicating a strong corporate backing. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring modern plugins and integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Vimeo API for multimedia content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, but lacks comprehensive security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulations. The domain WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional appearance and business claims. Strategic recommendations include improving privacy compliance, publishing security and incident response policies, and clarifying domain registration status to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 19 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mampaey.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
55
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mampaey holds a strong market position as a specialized B2B provider in the energy and transportation sectors, focusing on maritime mooring and towing equipment. Their business model revolves around engineering, manufacturing, and commissioning integrated systems tailored to port authorities, shipyards, and terminal operators worldwide. The company leverages its parent company Trelleborg Group for credibility and market reach. The website content and portfolio demonstrate a commitment to innovation, quality, and safety, which are key competitive advantages. Growth indicators include a broad global customer base and participation in major industry events. However, the lack of visible privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The partnership ecosystem is highlighted by the Trelleborg affiliation, but no other partners or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data detected. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is insufficient, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and similar regulations. The missing WHOIS registration data is a critical concern that undermines domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve defense-in-depth.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Clarify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mampaey
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mampaey
Description
Mampaey Offshore Industries is global market leader of innovative integrated mooring, berthing and towing systems. They provide state-of-the-art mooring, berthing and towing solutions and integrated information systems, focusing on safety and efficiency in ports and maritime/offshore industry.
Key services
Mooring & Berthing products and services, Safety Communication Link solutions, Towing hooks and systems, Custom solutions for maritime challenges, Integrated information systems (iMoor)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Vimeo Player API, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor Page Builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company domain email and phone number.
  4. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy blocking.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Jet plugins.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with good SSL configuration.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No WAF or security challenge detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and a suite of Jet plugins for enhanced functionality including mega menus, popups, search, and portfolio displays. It integrates multimedia content via Vimeo and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading and caching likely in place. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance, which could affect user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mampaey.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mampaey.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.