Skip to main content

Security report for majaiundarzam.lv

Akciju sabiedrība “DIĀNA” · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mājai un Dārzam is a well-established Latvian retail chain specializing in garden, household, and building materials, operating 19 physical stores across Latvia and an online presence via the partner e-commerce platform zum.lv. The company offers a variety of services including project department consultations, loyalty programs, product delivery, leasing options, and gift cards, targeting both individual and corporate customers. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with multilingual support and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website and business appear credible and professionally managed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching majaiundarzam.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in Latvia's retail sector for home and garden products, leveraging a multi-channel sales approach combining physical stores and online sales. Their loyalty programs and project services enhance customer engagement and retention. Partnerships with known brands and financial institutions for leasing and digital transformation projects indicate strategic growth and innovation. The business targets a broad customer base including both private individuals and businesses, with a focus on competitive pricing and comprehensive product offerings. The presence of multiple store locations and investment in new stores reflects medium-sized enterprise scale and stable growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Tracking and marketing tools are implemented with user consent considerations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available on the site, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security risk is low but could be further mitigated by adopting additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and security policies on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Akciju sabiedrība “DIĀNA”
Registration number
41203000447
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akciju sabiedrība “DIĀNA”
Description
Veikals specializējas dārza, mājsaimniecības preču un būvmateriālu preču mazumtirdzniecībā fiziskajiem un juridiskajiem klientiem.
Key services
Retail sales of garden, household and building materials, Project department services, Loyalty system and app development, Product delivery, Leasing options, Gift cards, Customer loyalty cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick carousel, PixelYourSite plugin, Consent Magic Pro plugin, Real3D Flipbook plugin, Sitepress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent mechanism for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a Latvian retail chain.
  2. Content is comprehensive and localized in Latvian with multilingual support (EN, RU).
  3. Multiple offers, promotions, and loyalty programs are detailed.
  4. Contact form collects name, email, phone, and store location.
  5. No privacy or terms of service pages explicitly found in provided content.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with Consent Magic Pro plugin.
  7. Tracking includes Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics with GDPR consent considerations.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content; SSL is enabled.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and several plugins for SEO, multilingual support, cookie consent, and marketing analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security header configurations. The site is well-maintained with no visible technical debt or errors in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with majaiundarzam.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review majaiundarzam.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.