Skip to main content

Security report for magnumvet.lt

Magnum Veterinarija · Healthcare · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magnum Veterinarija operates as a veterinary products and services provider based in Lithuania, targeting veterinary professionals and pet owners. The company offers a comprehensive catalog of veterinary medicines, animal feed, supplements, diagnostic and surgical equipment, and pet care products. The website is built on the Magento platform, leveraging modern frontend technologies such as RequireJS, jQuery, and React components for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and product categorization, supporting both B2B and B2C business models. From a technical perspective, the website demonstrates a solid infrastructure with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie configurations. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance, as no explicit privacy or cookie policies were detected. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, though the website content and HTTPS usage suggest a legitimate operation. Security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The site lacks GDPR compliance indicators and cookie consent mechanisms, which should be addressed to meet regulatory requirements. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security header implementations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magnumvet.lt

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magnum Veterinarija holds a medium-sized position in the Lithuanian veterinary healthcare retail sector, offering a broad range of products to veterinary clinics and pet owners. The company leverages e-commerce to distribute veterinary medicines, animal nutrition, and equipment, positioning itself as a comprehensive supplier in the regional market. The business model focuses on product sales with some B2B client registration capabilities. The website content and product offerings indicate a well-established catalog with recognized brands such as Hill's and VetExpert. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains suggests a standalone operation. Growth potential exists through improved digital marketing and enhanced privacy and security compliance to build customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure cookie settings, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of several recommended security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found. The site lacks a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security contact information, which limits incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is weak, with no detected privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR consent mechanisms. Addressing these gaps would improve regulatory compliance and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Establish a public vulnerability disclosure policy and provide security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to comply with EU regulations.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a WHOIS privacy service transparently to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magnum Veterinarija
Description
Magnum Veterinarija is a Lithuanian veterinary products and services provider offering a wide range of veterinary medicines, animal feed, supplements, diagnostic and surgical equipment, and pet care products. The website targets veterinary professionals and pet owners in Lithuania.
Key services
Veterinary medicines, Animal feed and supplements, Veterinary diagnostic and surgical equipment, Pet care products, Veterinary news and special offers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Magento, RequireJS, jQuery, React (carousel), Uppy (file uploader), Aheadworks Rbslider
Frameworks
Magento
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookie settings
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Login and registration forms present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product catalog.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  4. Contact phone number is clearly displayed but no email or physical address found.
  5. Magento platform used with modern frontend technologies.
  6. No obvious security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data found.
  7. No social media links or email contacts found in the provided HTML.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No GDPR compliance indicators or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magento CMS with RequireJS and jQuery for frontend scripting, and React components for interactive elements like carousels. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain, indicating self-hosted resources. The presence of Uppy file uploader and Aheadworks Rbslider suggests advanced UI features. Performance appears moderate with some heavy image assets in sliders. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security header improvements and privacy compliance enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magnumvet.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magnumvet.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.