Skip to main content

Security report for magmaproducts.co.uk

nexos · Energy · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

nexos is a specialized EPC contractor focused on commissioning and start-up services within the energy sector, delivering operational readiness and safety for new and upgraded facilities. The company leverages extensive engineering expertise and proprietary technology (CHOMS) to ensure efficient project handover and operational success. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear service offerings and international reach. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and is hosted on Amazon S3, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though improvements are needed in security headers and incident response visibility. Privacy compliance is addressed with policies present but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain appears legitimate with privacy-protected WHOIS data and a domain expiry consistent with active business operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magmaproducts.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted EPC contractor in the energy sector, offering integrated commissioning and start-up services supported by innovative technology solutions. Its parent company is D2Zero, indicating a broader corporate structure. The business model focuses on engineering and project management services with a strong emphasis on safety and operational efficiency. The website targets energy companies requiring EPC services and demonstrates a medium-sized enterprise profile with international operations. The presence of case studies and proprietary tools suggests competitive advantages and a commitment to quality delivery. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube supports marketing and engagement efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of secure third-party form embedding (ActiveCampaign) enhances data protection during user interactions. However, the absence of key security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and lack of visible incident response or security policy documentation represent gaps that could be addressed to improve resilience and compliance. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may pose compliance risks. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the content or WHOIS data. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible incident response policy and dedicated security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner or mechanism to ensure full GDPR compliance regarding user tracking and cookies.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain high standards and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
SC633398
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
nexos
Description
nexos is an EPC contractor specializing in commissioning and start-up services for energy projects, focusing on operational readiness, safety, and project success. They provide engineering expertise and have developed proprietary technology to manage project handover efficiently.
Key services
Commissioning and start-up management, Development of commissioning procedures, Safety systems functionality verification, Operational team training, Production rate optimization, Custom online handover management system (CHOMS)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, GSAP, Swiper, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form embedded via ActiveCampaign

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
ActiveCampaign
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on EPC commissioning services.
  2. No WHOIS registrant data publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  3. No security headers detected in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  5. Includes contact email and physical address in Scotland.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite cookie policy presence.
  7. No visible security or incident response policies on the site.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including jQuery, GSAP for animations, and Swiper for sliders, combined with Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting assets on Amazon S3 ensures reliable content delivery. The site is mobile optimized with smooth scrolling and responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing scripts and images. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced for better compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magmaproducts.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magmaproducts.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.