Skip to main content

Security report for magicagency.lv

Magic · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magic is a full-service advertising agency based in the Baltics, recognized as the Baltic Agency of the Year 2024. The company partners with major Baltic brands to deliver comprehensive marketing solutions including campaigns, strategy, design, digital solutions, production, and activations. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, built on the Webflow platform with integration of Google Analytics and Typekit fonts. The site is well-designed with good user experience and mobile optimization, targeting business clients in the Baltic region. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, Magic presents as a credible and established agency with a solid market position but should enhance its privacy and security disclosures to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magicagency.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magic operates in the media and advertising sector, focusing on the Baltic market. Their business model centers on providing end-to-end advertising services to large regional brands, positioning themselves as a leading agency with award recognition. The company leverages digital marketing tools and creative production capabilities to serve its clients. The website's content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting their market positioning. The absence of detailed business registration or contact information on the site suggests a focus on client engagement through direct channels rather than public disclosure. The integration of social media links to Facebook and Instagram indicates active engagement with digital marketing channels. No related or partner domains were identified from the provided data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in security governance. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit data retention or privacy compliance details are available. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve website reach and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magic
Description
We're a full-service advertising agency partnering with the Baltics' biggest brands to deliver seamless campaigns, strategy, design, digital solutions, production, and activations.
Key services
campaigns, strategy, design, digital solutions, production, activations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Typekit Fonts, Webflow CMS, Lottie animations
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Typekit Fonts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Social media links to Facebook and Instagram present in navigation.
  6. Website uses Webflow CMS and includes Google Analytics and Typekit fonts.
  7. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the HTML content.
  8. Content is professional, focused on advertising services in the Baltic region.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Typekit fonts and Lottie animations for enhanced user experience. Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis and user behavior tracking. The site appears to have moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The HTML content is valid and well-structured, but lacks some SEO and accessibility optimizations. There is no evidence of server-side security configurations or advanced technical controls in the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional digital presence but could benefit from modernization in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magicagency.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magicagency.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.