Skip to main content

Security report for magdelena.lv

Magdelēna · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Magdelēna is a real estate development project focused on creating a modern, functional, and sustainable urban environment in the center of Riga, Latvia. The website presents the business as a provider of aesthetically pleasing and energy-efficient living and working spaces, targeting local residents and commercial tenants. The digital presence is built on modern web technologies including Vue.js and PrimeVue, offering a responsive and visually appealing user experience. The site includes essential compliance features such as a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy, reflecting awareness of GDPR requirements. However, explicit contact details like emails and phone numbers are not prominently displayed, relying primarily on contact forms for communication. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the website content aligns with a legitimate real estate business. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in security transparency and contact accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magdelena.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
73
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Magdelēna positions itself as a key player in the Riga real estate market, offering sustainable and modern urban living and working spaces. Its business model revolves around property development and leasing, targeting both residential and commercial clients. The website's content and design suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on quality and sustainability. The lack of visible partner or subsidiary domains indicates a focused business scope. The company leverages modern web frameworks to maintain a contemporary digital presence, which supports its market positioning. Growth potential is implied through the emphasis on energy efficiency and urban lifestyle, appealing to environmentally conscious customers. The absence of detailed business registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper corporate intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced as indicated by the URL, and a cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided HTML content. There is no visible security policy or incident response page, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which are best practices for transparency and security readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries in the analyzed content. To enhance security maturity, the company should implement additional HTTP security headers, publish clear security policies, and establish formal incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Provide clear and direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magdelēna
Description
Magdelēnas kvartāls ir mūsdienīga, funkcionāla un ilgtspējīga pilsētvide, kas piedāvā estētisma un enerģijas pilnu dzīves un darba telpu Rīgas centrā.
Key services
Real estate development, Residential and commercial leasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, PrimeVue, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with modern UI frameworks.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local real estate market.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content; contact form is primary contact method.
  5. No visible security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure pages.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML snippet.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Vue.js and PrimeVue, with Swiper.js for interactive elements like galleries or sliders. The design is responsive and optimized for both desktop and mobile devices, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses custom fonts and CSS variables for consistent theming. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Performance appears moderate based on the complexity of scripts and stylesheets loaded. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by adding accessibility enhancements and optimizing security headers. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, aligning with privacy-conscious design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magdelena.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magdelena.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.