Skip to main content

Security report for magcloud.com

RPI Print, Inc. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MagCloud is an online self-publishing platform operated by RPI Print, Inc., offering users the ability to create, sell, and distribute print and digital publications such as magazines, flyers, posters, and pamphlets. The platform integrates with Adobe tools and provides storefront and worldwide shipping capabilities, positioning itself as a niche player in the media and e-commerce sectors. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting individuals and businesses seeking publishing solutions. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Underscore.js, Modernizr, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Tealium, supporting analytics and marketing efforts. The site is mobile optimized with moderate performance and basic accessibility features. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR consent mechanisms. However, no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may impact user trust. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front with a solid business model and technical foundation. The main concern is the absence of WHOIS registration data, which is unusual for an established domain and should be further investigated. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and contact information availability are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain staging.magcloud.com points to unregistered service prod-pupa-vpc-alb-345239885.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching magcloud.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
40
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

MagCloud operates in the media and e-commerce sectors as a self-publishing platform enabling users to create and monetize print and digital content. Its business model revolves around providing publishing tools, storefront management, and distribution services including worldwide shipping and direct mail. The company leverages partnerships, notably with Blurb.com, to enhance its offerings. The target customers include individual creators, small businesses, and organizations needing professional publishing solutions. The platform's market position is that of a specialized niche provider with a medium-sized operational scale. Growth indicators include active social media presence and integration of advanced marketing and analytics tools. The lack of explicit contact information and missing WHOIS data are notable operational gaps.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-consistent cookie consent and privacy policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security documentation, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RPI Print, Inc.
Description
Make newsstand-quality magazines, flyers, posters, pamphlets, and more. Create print and digital versions using Adobe InDesign and Photoshop with our custom publishing platform.
Key services
Print and digital publishing platform, Custom publishing using Adobe tools, Online storefront for selling publications, Worldwide shipping and direct mail services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Underscore.js, Modernizr, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Tealium, DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Tealium
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Tealium
Marketing tools
Tealium
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to print and digital publishing
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found
  8. WHOIS data missing or domain not found in WHOIS database, unusual for established site
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of established JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Underscore.js, and Modernizr to support interactive and responsive features. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Tealium, and DoubleClick Floodlight for user behavior tracking and advertising. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses canonical URLs and meta tags for SEO. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The technical infrastructure appears stable but could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with magcloud.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review magcloud.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.