Skip to main content

Security report for m1.realtor

National Association of Realtors · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website is a secure authentication portal for the National Association of Realtors, leveraging Auth0's OAuth2-based authentication platform. It serves as a login gateway for real estate professionals to access member services. The technical infrastructure is modern, utilizing industry-standard security protocols such as OAuth2 with PKCE and HTTPS encryption. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools are integrated, indicating a mature digital marketing approach but with limited visible privacy compliance on this page. Security posture is strong in terms of authentication mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and privacy disclosures. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its purpose but could improve transparency and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching m1.realtor

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The National Association of Realtors operates a large-scale membership platform targeting real estate professionals in the United States. The business model focuses on providing secure access to member services through a trusted authentication provider, Auth0. The integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to member engagement. The domain is a subdomain of Auth0, indicating reliance on third-party SaaS for identity management. Partnerships with domains like demdex.net for Adobe ID syncing highlight a sophisticated marketing ecosystem. The business maintains a strong market position as a leading real estate association with a focus on secure, scalable digital services.

Security posture

The site demonstrates a high level of security maturity in authentication, using OAuth2 with PKCE and Auth0Lock widget for secure login. HTTPS is enforced, and sandboxed iframes are used for third-party integrations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies reduce overall compliance and security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The extensive use of tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms may pose privacy compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response and security contact information are not provided on this page, which is a gap in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Add explicit privacy and cookie policy links on the login page to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Review and optimize third-party tracking to ensure GDPR and privacy law compliance, including consent mechanisms.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization for better user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
National Association of Realtors
Description
Authentication portal for Realtors using Auth0 service, enabling login and access to realtor services via OAuth2 protocol.
Key services
User authentication, Access to realtor member services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Auth0, OAuth2, JavaScript, Tealium, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Personyze, DoubleClick, Adobe Demdex
Frameworks
Auth0Lock
Platforms
Auth0 Authentication Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of OAuth2 with PKCE (S256) code challenge
  • Use of Auth0Lock widget for secure login
  • Sandboxed iframe for Adobe ID syncing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Medallia, Personyze, Tealium
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Personyze, Tealium
Marketing tools
Medallia, Tealium, Personyze
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an authentication login page using Auth0 for the National Association of Realtors.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are directly linked on the login page.
  3. No contact information or security policy details are provided on this page.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing tags are present, indicating extensive user tracking.
  5. No forms other than the Auth0Lock login widget are present.
  6. No email addresses or phone numbers found on the login page.
  7. HTTPS is enforced and OAuth2 with PKCE is used, indicating good security practices.
  8. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is expected.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack centered around Auth0 for authentication, with OAuth2 protocol and PKCE for enhanced security. JavaScript libraries and frameworks include Auth0Lock and various analytics and marketing tags from Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Tealium, and Personyze. The site loads asynchronously to improve performance, though mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No CMS or hosting provider details are directly evident. The site is well integrated with marketing and analytics platforms but could benefit from improved SEO and accessibility practices. The use of sandboxed iframes for third-party integrations is a positive security control.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with m1.realtor. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review m1.realtor.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.