Skip to main content

Security report for m0n.co

Monzilla Media · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

m0n.co is a curated web platform operated by Monzilla Media that aggregates a wide range of free online tools primarily targeted at web developers, IT professionals, and users seeking utilities related to web development, HTTP testing, proxy services, PHP utilities, and .htaccess management. The site functions as a directory linking to external trusted resources rather than providing direct services or data collection. The business model is focused on providing utility through aggregation and curation, positioning itself as a niche resource in the technology sector. The website is small in scale with consistent branding and good content relevance for its target audience. Technically, the site is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, utilizing jQuery and Isotope.js for UI filtering and layout. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring secure transport, and external links open in new tabs to protect user navigation. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a lightweight and straightforward technical infrastructure. Performance is moderate, suitable for the site's purpose. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices by enforcing HTTPS and avoiding user data collection through forms. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which limits compliance with privacy regulations and reduces user trust. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, common for small sites but reducing transparency. Overall, m0n.co presents a low-risk profile with a focus on utility and minimal data handling. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and business transparency would enhance trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of m0n.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching m0n.co

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

m0n.co operates as a curated directory of web tools, targeting developers and IT users needing quick access to utilities for web development, HTTP diagnostics, proxy services, and PHP-related tools. The business model is aggregation-based, relying on external services rather than proprietary offerings. The site is positioned as a niche utility resource with no direct monetization or advertising detected. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a small-scale operation with limited direct customer engagement. The partnership ecosystem is broad in terms of linked external tools but no formal partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. Growth potential lies in expanding tool coverage and improving compliance and trust signals.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic but effective security posture by enforcing HTTPS and avoiding user data collection, minimizing attack surface. However, the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates gaps in security best practices and regulatory compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Incident response readiness is not documented, and no security contact channels are provided. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical but reduces transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add contact information including a security incident response contact to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and mobile responsiveness for better user experience.
  5. Consider adding structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and better indexing by search engines.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Monzilla Media
Description
Free online tools for working on the Web
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.4, Isotope.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://m0n.co/)
  • No forms or inputs collecting user data
  • External links open in new tabs

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a curated directory of external web tools focused on web development and IT utilities.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the site.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and external links open in new tabs for user safety.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  7. Site design is simple but functional with basic mobile optimization.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; content fully accessible.
  9. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected, common for small sites but reduces transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple, static HTML structure enhanced with CSS and JavaScript libraries including jQuery 2.1.4 and Isotope.js for dynamic filtering and layout. No CMS or backend technologies are detected, indicating a lightweight and maintainable infrastructure. The site is served over HTTPS with canonical URLs properly set. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or resources detected. SEO is basic with meta description and viewport tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The technical stack is appropriate for the site's purpose but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with m0n.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review m0n.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

m0n.co security report: 58/100, medium risk | Guard