Skip to main content

Security report for m0n.co

Monzilla Media · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

m0n.co is a niche web utility site curated by Monzilla Media that provides a comprehensive collection of free online tools for web developers, IT professionals, and tech enthusiasts. The site aggregates links to various categories including search engines, HTTP tools, proxy services, PHP utilities, and .htaccess tools, positioning itself as a useful resource hub rather than a direct service provider. The business model is based on curation and aggregation, targeting a specialized audience seeking quick access to web-related tools. Technically, the website employs a simple but effective front-end stack using HTML5, CSS3, jQuery, and Isotope.js for dynamic filtering of tool categories. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations. There is no detected CMS or complex backend infrastructure, indicating a lightweight and static content approach. From a security perspective, the site lacks critical security headers and does not provide HTTPS enforcement details, which limits its security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is disclosed, which may impact user trust and compliance with data protection regulations. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal user data collection, reducing privacy risks but also limiting business intelligence. Overall, m0n.co is a functional and safe resource site with good content quality and user experience but requires improvements in security practices, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching m0n.co

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

m0n.co operates as a curated directory of free web tools, serving a niche market of developers and IT professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in the comprehensive aggregation of diverse utilities in one accessible interface. The business model appears non-commercial or low-commercial, focusing on utility rather than monetization, with no visible advertising or affiliate programs. The target customers are tech-savvy users seeking quick access to specialized tools. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of marketing or analytics. The partnership ecosystem is broad, linking to many third-party tool providers but no formal partnerships are evident. Strategic observations suggest potential to expand with added services, improved compliance, and enhanced security to increase credibility and user base.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of m0n.co is low to moderate. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement details and security headers, which are essential for protecting users and preventing common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the absence of security policies and incident response contacts indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which may affect GDPR and other regulations. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no forms or data collection observed. The security culture is not evident from the site content. Business impact of these gaps is moderate given the site's informational nature but should be addressed to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update external links to ensure security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Monzilla Media
Description
Free online tools for working on the Web
Key services
curated links to search engines, HTTP tools, proxy services, PHP tools, .htaccess tools, miscellaneous web utilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.4, Isotope.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a curated directory of free online web tools.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or security policies disclosed.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. Uses basic front-end technologies with jQuery and Isotope.js for UI filtering.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations visible.
  8. All external links point to well-known or niche tool providers.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple, static front-end architecture with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries including jQuery 2.1.4 and Isotope.js for UI filtering. The site lacks a CMS or backend framework, indicating low technical complexity. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by meta tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking technologies. Technical risks include outdated jQuery version and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include upgrading JavaScript libraries, implementing responsive design improvements, and adding accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with m0n.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review m0n.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.