Skip to main content

Security report for lunique.ch

L'Unique Foundation · Hospitality · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

L'Unique Foundation operates a unique hospitality and cultural business in Basel, combining an Italian restaurant, bar, and rock museum with a non-profit foundation focused on water-related aid projects. The business holds a niche market position as Basel's first rock museum and gallery, offering a distinctive rock'n'roll atmosphere alongside quality Italian cuisine and drinks. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting general audiences interested in culture, dining, and charity. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, supporting multilingual content and integrated analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, though additional security headers and a vulnerability disclosure page would enhance trust. Overall, the site is accessible, well-structured, and compliant with GDPR through a privacy policy page, though cookie consent mechanisms are not evident. Contact information is clear and comprehensive, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lunique.ch

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a hybrid business model combining hospitality services with non-profit activities, enhancing its community impact and brand differentiation. Its market positioning as a cultural hub with exclusive rock art collections and exhibitions supports a loyal local and tourist customer base. Revenue streams include restaurant and bar sales, foundation donations, and online shop sales for art and foundation merchandise. The partnership ecosystem includes the L'Unique Foundation and Rock Art Collection, both linked domains supporting the core business. Growth indicators include a long-standing presence since 2002 and active social media engagement. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital marketing and enhance security transparency to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security researchers and users. Data protection practices are partially evident through a privacy policy and analytics opt-out mechanisms, but cookie consent is lacking. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business size but could be improved to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure or security policy page to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a stronger security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
L'Unique Foundation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
L'Unique Foundation
Description
Basel's erstes Rock Museum, Restaurant & Bar. Ausstellungen von Celebrity Art, Rock Art & Rock Memorabilien. Drinks & Italienische Küche in der einmaligen Atmosphäre des Rock'n'Rolls.
Key services
Italian restaurant and bar, Rock museum and gallery exhibitions, Non-profit water aid projects via L'Unique Foundation, Online shops for foundation and art
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.4, Yoast SEO 26.1.1, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Premium Addons for Elementor, WPML (multilingual), WP Google Maps, SearchWP Live Ajax Search
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Google Analytics opt-out mechanism provided

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German with English language option.
  3. Strong integration of hospitality and non-profit foundation activities.
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, but privacy policy page exists.
  7. Security practices are good but could be improved with additional headers and disclosure.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for optimization, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Integration of Google Analytics and MonsterInsights provides robust analytics capabilities, while WPML enables multilingual support. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential, especially in loading times and accessibility. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms, enhancing security. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of certain security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests areas for modernization. Hosting provider details are not explicit, which could be clarified for better infrastructure transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lunique.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lunique.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.