Skip to main content

Security report for lunexpower.com

Lunex Power · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lunex Power is a solar energy company specializing in the design and installation of high-efficiency residential, commercial, and off-grid solar systems across multiple US states. The company positions itself as a trusted provider with over 4,000 installations and 50+ years of combined experience, offering turnkey services including permitting, installation, and maintenance. Their website showcases a professional and modern digital presence built on Next.js and hosted on Vercel, featuring rich content, customer testimonials, and partnerships with leading solar technology providers such as Tesla and Enphase. Technically, the website is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, leveraging modern frameworks and analytics tools. However, there is a lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled, but the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Despite this, the website's professional content and trust signals mitigate some risk. Overall, the site presents a credible business front but should enhance transparency around privacy, security policies, and domain registration to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lunexpower.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lunex Power operates in the energy sector, focusing on solar power solutions for homes and businesses. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end solar system services, including design, installation, and ongoing support. The company targets residential and commercial customers in several US states, leveraging partnerships with major solar equipment manufacturers to offer quality products. Their market position is supported by a strong portfolio of installations and positive customer reviews across multiple platforms. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on growth and regional expansion. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a trustworthy image. However, the lack of detailed company registration and contact information online may limit full business transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. It uses modern web technologies that inherently support security best practices. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options are not detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, nor a security.txt file, which limits the ability for security researchers to report issues responsibly. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and disclose domain registration details to improve trustworthiness and transparency.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including dedicated security contact emails, to improve communication and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lunex Power
Description
Lunex Power designs and installs high-efficiency residential, commercial, and off-grid solar systems. Serving FL, MA, CT, RI, CO, NC, and SC.
Key services
Home Solar, Commercial Solar, Off-Grid Solar, Solar Panels, Solar Inverters, Solar Batteries, EV Charging
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics, Google Maps API, Vercel Speed Insights
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks with security features

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Marketing tools
Vercel Analytics, Google Maps API
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content
  5. Strong branding and trust signals via customer reviews and partner logos
  6. Modern technology stack with Next.js and Vercel hosting
  7. No security headers explicitly detected in provided data
  8. No security or incident response contact information disclosed
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, and hosted on Vercel, which provides fast and scalable infrastructure. It integrates Google Maps API and Vercel Analytics for enhanced user experience and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is explicitly detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Performance is fast, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Technical risks are minimal but include the absence of explicit security headers and incomplete privacy compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lunexpower.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lunexpower.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.