Skip to main content

Security report for lunabit.cc

LunaBit · Finance · Russia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LunaBit is a Russian-based online cryptocurrency exchange platform offering fast and secure digital asset transactions. The service targets cryptocurrency users seeking reliable and instant exchange options between popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, and various fiat currencies. LunaBit positions itself as a trustworthy and user-friendly service with a broad range of exchange directions and partner affiliations with recognized crypto exchange aggregators. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, and integrates analytics tools like Yandex Metrika and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and captcha protections on forms, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, LunaBit demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity and business credibility in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lunabit.cc

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LunaBit operates in the competitive cryptocurrency exchange market, focusing on speed, security, and ease of use. Its business model revolves around facilitating instant crypto-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat exchanges with low commissions and transparent fees. The platform targets individual traders and crypto enthusiasts primarily in Russia and Russian-speaking regions. Partnerships with well-known exchange aggregators enhance its market visibility and trustworthiness. The presence of user reviews and a dedicated feedback page supports customer engagement and reputation management. However, the absence of physical addresses and phone contacts may limit trust for some users. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused niche in digital asset exchange services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses captcha on registration forms, indicating basic security hygiene. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No dedicated security policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were detected in the scripts used. Privacy compliance is limited, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-specific disclosures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by publishing clear security policies, implementing additional HTTP security headers, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and display a comprehensive cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider adding phone and physical address contact information to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LunaBit
Description
LunaBit — надежный сервис, предлагающий мгновенные обмены и безопасные транзакции с популярными криптовалютами. Удобный интерфейс, строгие стандарты безопасности и круглосуточная поддержка делают LunaBit идеальным выбором для всех, кто ценит скорость и надежность в мире цифровых активов.
Key services
Instant cryptocurrency exchange, Secure transactions, Customer support, Wide range of exchange directions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, PHP (implied by .php and WordPress), Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Captcha on registration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
JivoSite live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Russian-language cryptocurrency exchange platform
  2. Offers a wide range of crypto and fiat exchange directions
  3. Includes user registration and login forms with captcha
  4. Has partner affiliations with known crypto exchange aggregators
  5. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools
  6. Lacks explicit cookie policy and detailed security/incident response policies
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  8. Contact primarily via email and Telegram link
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive UI components. It uses external fonts from Google Fonts and content delivery via jsDelivr CDN. Analytics are implemented through Yandex Metrika and Google Analytics, providing user behavior insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and includes captcha verification on forms to prevent automated abuse. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization by adding ARIA attributes and structured data markup. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional and user-friendly crypto exchange platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lunabit.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lunabit.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.