Skip to main content

Security report for lumenucentrs.lv

Lumenu Centrs · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lumenu Centrs is a Latvian-based company specializing in lighting solutions and furniture, serving a diverse clientele including private sector, offices, retail, educational institutions, public sector, and industrial clients. The company leverages partnerships with leading European manufacturers to deliver tailored lighting projects, including design, calculations, 3D visualizations, and energy audits. Their website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence with detailed project portfolios and contact information for key personnel. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is secured with HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a basic level of privacy compliance. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate business. Overall, Lumenu Centrs presents a solid business and digital footprint with room for improvement in security best practices and compliance transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing incident response information, and enhancing privacy policy details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lumenucentrs.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lumenu Centrs operates in the lighting and furniture sector, targeting both private and public sectors in Latvia. Their business model combines product sales with consulting and project management services, positioning them as a specialist provider with a strong European manufacturer network. The company demonstrates a clear market position with a focus on quality and comprehensive service offerings. The website's detailed project showcases and active social media presence indicate ongoing engagement with clients and partners. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded service transparency.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic but effective security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web threats. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but improvable to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate security issue reporting.
  3. Enhance privacy policy details to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention practices.
  4. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements to broaden user inclusivity and SEO benefits.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lumenu Centrs
Description
Lumenu Centrs is a team of lighting specialists and designers offering lighting solutions and furniture for private sector, offices, stores, educational and state institutions, sports, streets, parks, parking lots, industrial sites, warehouses, and various facades. They provide consultations, lighting design, calculations, 3D visualizations, energy audits, competitive offers, and careful order execution.
Key services
Lighting consultation, Lighting design and calculations, 3D visualizations, Energy efficiency audits, Sales of lighting fixtures and furniture
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, WP Rocket, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and functional.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response info found on site.
  5. Multiple social media profiles linked and active.
  6. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS.
  7. Contact information is detailed with multiple personnel listed.
  8. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js, and Google APIs. It uses WP Rocket for performance optimization and lazy loading for images. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. However, some lazy loading images report 'error' status in the HTML snapshot, which may indicate minor resource loading issues. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lumenucentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lumenucentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.