Skip to main content

Security report for lullberry.com

Lullberry · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lullberry is a small retail and e-commerce business focused on personal growth products such as playful habit trackers and apparel themed around positive psychology. The company offers workshops and promotes happiness through playfulness. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, and Pinterest. The site is well designed, mobile optimized, and provides clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and secure payment processing via Stripe, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy and terms policies are present, indicating a reasonable level of compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the active and professional website presence suggests a legitimate business. Contact information is limited to a contact form without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and technical implementation but should improve transparency on domain registration and direct contact details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lullberry.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lullberry occupies a niche market in personal growth and playful habit tracking products, targeting a general audience interested in self-improvement and happiness. The business model centers on e-commerce sales of physical products and workshops. The company demonstrates social responsibility by donating 10% to charity (partnering with Kiva). The website's multilingual capabilities and currency options indicate an international customer base. The use of modern marketing and analytics tools suggests a digitally mature operation. Growth potential exists in expanding product lines and workshop offerings. The lack of direct contact details and missing WHOIS data are areas for improvement to enhance customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure payment gateways, which are key strengths. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not found, indicating potential gaps in security governance. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and could impact trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing additional security headers, publishing incident response information, and verifying domain registration details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve security governance and customer trust.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve customer support and credibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lullberry
Description
Simple everyday objects for play and personal growth. Discover and use the tips of positive psychology and become happy on life's journey!
Key services
Selling habit trackers, Apparel with positive psychology themes, Workshops on happiness and playfulness
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Pinterest tracking, Stripe payment gateway
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure payment gateway (Stripe)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pinterest, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling personal growth products
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and good SEO metadata
  3. Privacy and terms pages are present and linked in footer
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  6. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, Pinterest
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site
  9. WHOIS data missing, raising some legitimacy concerns
  10. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses modern web technologies including JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing integrations (Google Analytics, HubSpot, Pinterest). The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and website. The site uses multiple currency options and multilingual support via WPML, indicating a sophisticated e-commerce setup. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins or themes and missing security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lullberry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lullberry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.