Skip to main content

Security report for lubostoman.com

Luboš Toman · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Luboš Toman operates a professional photography website focused on sports, cultural, and reportage photography primarily targeting Czech-speaking audiences. The site showcases galleries, blog content, and provides clear contact information, positioning itself as a niche local photography service. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, Bootstrap framework, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. While HTTPS is enforced and basic security practices are in place, the absence of HTTP security headers and a cookie consent mechanism indicates room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is notably missing, which raises questions about domain registration legitimacy despite the active and professional website presence. Overall, the site scores well in content quality and business credibility but should address security and compliance gaps to enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lubostoman.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector as a small-scale professional photographer offering specialized services in sports and cultural event photography. The website serves as a portfolio and marketing channel, supplemented by a blog to engage visitors. The target market includes event attendees and photography enthusiasts in the Czech Republic. The business model is service-oriented, relying on direct client engagement. The presence of social media links and a contact form supports customer interaction. The lack of detailed company registration information and missing WHOIS data suggests a sole proprietorship or individual operation rather than a corporate entity. The website's consistent branding and quality content support a positive market position within its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form against spam. However, the absence of critical HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and content injection. Client-side JavaScript disables right-click and copy actions, which can be easily bypassed and do not provide real security. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are present, limiting transparency. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, while basic security measures are implemented, enhancements are recommended to align with best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Luboš Toman
Description
Sportovní a reportážní fotografie Luboš Toman. Fotografování reportáží, sportu, kultury a lidí. Fotografie, které mají něco navíc.
Key services
Sport photography, Cultural event photography, People photography, Reportage photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Bootstrap 4.5.0, FontAwesome 5, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Contact Form 7, Sassy Social Share
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on contact form
  • Right-click, copy, inspect element disabled via JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Sassy Social Share
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional photography portfolio and blog in Czech language.
  2. Content is rich with galleries, blog posts, and contact information.
  3. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  4. Security measures include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lack advanced HTTP headers.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern tech stack including Bootstrap 4.5.0 for responsive design, FontAwesome 5 for icons, and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for spam protection on forms. The site loads CSS and JS assets from both local and trusted external CDNs such as StackPath and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with caching plugins indicated by minified CSS/JS files. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No server-side security headers were detected in the HTML content, indicating potential gaps in server configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but can benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lubostoman.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lubostoman.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.