Skip to main content

Security report for lubinas.lv

Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.lubinas.lv represents a small Latvian business specializing in the production and installation of wooden shingle roofs (lubiņu jumtu ražošana un ieklāšana). The company emphasizes natural, ecological, and traditional roofing solutions using high-quality wooden shingles. The site targets Latvian-speaking customers interested in authentic and sustainable roofing options. The business model focuses on manufacturing and installation services with a niche market position in Latvia. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and FontAwesome, with Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the source. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers or incident response policies are found. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are detected. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate with privacy protection likely enabled. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations. The main risks relate to the lack of visible security headers and incident response information. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lubinas.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, specifically in roofing manufacturing and installation. It holds a niche position in Latvia, focusing on traditional wooden shingle roofs, appealing to customers valuing ecological and historical roofing methods. The business model is direct manufacturing and service delivery with a small company size. Contact details and social media presence support customer engagement. The absence of detailed company registration data limits deeper business intelligence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The website content and portfolio showcase completed projects, indicating active operations and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner for privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. No signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices and formalizing security policies to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding structured business information (e.g., JSON-LD) to improve SEO and trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Ražojam lubiņas (skaidas) jumtu segumam. Veicam Jumtu kontrukcijas remontu un lubiņu jumtu seguma ieklāšanu.
Key services
Production of wooden shingles (lubiņas), Roof construction repair, Installation of wooden shingle roofs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Roboto)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; domain registration details unknown.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No visible security headers or explicit security policies found.
  5. No forms detected that collect user data directly on homepage.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Social media presence on Instagram and YouTube linked.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts explicitly detected.
  9. Website uses common JS libraries and fonts for UI and UX.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery and popular UI libraries like Owl Carousel and Fancybox. Google Fonts and FontAwesome are used for typography and icons. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with multiple CSS files targeting different devices. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or slow-loading elements. No CMS or backend platform is detected from the HTML source. The site lacks advanced technical SEO features such as JSON-LD structured data for business or product schema. Hosting provider and server configuration details are not available. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business site but could be modernized with newer frameworks and enhanced SEO markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lubinas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lubinas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.