Skip to main content

Security report for ltv.lv

Valsts SIA “Latvijas Sabiedriskais medijs” · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Sabiedriskais medijs is the national public media organization of Latvia, operating multiple television channels including LTV1 and LTV7, as well as digital platforms such as LSM.lv and REplay.lv. It serves a broad audience including general public, children, and diaspora communities, providing news, cultural, educational, and entertainment content. The organization is state-owned and holds a significant position in the Latvian media landscape, being a member of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies and comprehensive content offerings. Technically, the website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks (Nuxt.js and Vue.js), employs performance and analytics tools like Chartbeat and Gemius, and uses Cloudflare for hosting and security insights. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with good SEO practices and a professional design. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented in compliance with GDPR. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses standard security headers, and does not expose sensitive data. However, explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen security posture and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ltv.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ltv.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
70
Employees
10
Customers
23
Third parties
37
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-05-15 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ltv.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • er•••@ltv.lvmail.ltv.lv2026-05-15
  • er•••@ltv.lvmail.ltv.lv2026-02-22
  • ar•••@ltv.lvvestis.ltv.lv2026-01-30
  • er•••@ltv.lvmail.ltv.lv2025-12-23
  • er•••@ltv.lvvestis.ltv.lv2025-12-05

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Latvijas Sabiedriskais medijs holds a dominant position as Latvia's public broadcaster, funded by the state and free from commercial advertising. Its business model focuses on public service media, targeting a wide demographic including families, youth, and minority language speakers. The organization leverages multiple content platforms to maximize reach and engagement, including specialized platforms for children and teenagers. Its partnership ecosystem includes related media portals and radio services, enhancing content diversity and audience coverage. Growth indicators include recent platform launches and content expansions. The organization's operations reflect a strategic focus on cultural promotion, education, and reliable news dissemination, positioning it as a trusted national media institution.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive use of security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. The organization should consider publishing a security policy and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance stakeholder trust and incident management capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security or abuse email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance transparency by naming a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.
  5. Maintain and regularly update cookie and privacy policies to reflect evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Valsts SIA “Latvijas Sabiedriskais medijs”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Valsts SIA “Latvijas Sabiedriskais medijs”
Description
Latvijas Televīzija ir valsts sabiedrība ar ierobežotu atbildību, kas darbojas kā sabiedriskais medijs, piedāvājot plašu televīzijas un interneta saturu, tostarp ziņas, kultūras un izglītojošus raidījumus.
Key services
Televīzijas kanāli LTV1, LTV7, Interneta televīzijas kanāli un platformas, Ziņu un kultūras satura veidošana, Satura platformas bērniem un jauniešiem, Tiešraides un arhīva satura nodrošināšana
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Chartbeat, Gemius, CookieFirst, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Chartbeat, Gemius, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Chartbeat, Gemius
Marketing tools
CookieFirst
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong presence of official contact information and social media channels.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; limits domain registration verification.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack (Nuxt.js and Vue.js), enabling server-side rendering and good performance. It uses third-party analytics and tracking tools such as Chartbeat and Gemius, integrated with a cookie consent management system (CookieFirst). Hosting and security insights are provided via Cloudflare. The site is well-structured with preloading of critical assets and optimized images, contributing to fast load times. Accessibility and mobile responsiveness are well addressed. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. The technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable digital media platform, though continuous monitoring for third-party library vulnerabilities is recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ltv.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ltv.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.