Skip to main content

Security report for lowinebar.lv

LOWINE · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LOWINE is a small hospitality business operating as a natural wine bar and kitchen in Latvia. The website showcases their offerings including breakfast, dinner, natural wines, coffee, champagne, and artisan food. The business is positioned as a Michelin recognized establishment for 2025, indicating a high-quality culinary experience. The site is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Analytics for user tracking. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and contact information. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps that should be addressed. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lowinebar.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets mature audiences interested in natural wines and artisan food, focusing on local produce and quality dining experiences. Their market position is strengthened by Michelin recognition, which serves as a strong trust indicator. The business model revolves around hospitality services with a focus on curated wine and food offerings. The website links to a related domain lowine.lv, likely an e-commerce or partner site. The company maintains active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, supporting marketing and customer engagement. Growth potential is indicated by professional branding and clear service offerings, though lack of detailed company registration info limits deeper business intelligence.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics for tracking. No forms collecting sensitive data were detected, reducing immediate privacy risks. However, the site lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and other regulations. Incident response contacts are not provided. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing security headers, privacy compliance documents, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and monitor WHOIS data availability to improve domain trust and legitimacy verification.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LOWINE
Description
Natural Wine Bar & Kitchen offering breakfast, natural wines, coffee, champagne, artisan food. Operating hours and reservation info provided.
Key services
Breakfast, Dinner, Natural Wines, Coffee, Champagne, Artisan Food
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Tilda CMS scripts and styles, Google Fonts (Inter)
Frameworks
Tilda website builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by og:url https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive info

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed natural wine bar and kitchen site.
  2. Content is rich with business info, operating hours, and reservation notes.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No forms detected that collect personal data, reducing privacy risk.
  6. Social media links to Facebook and Instagram are present and active.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking user behavior.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Site uses Tilda CMS and CDN for hosting and delivery.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, using jQuery 1.10.2 and Google Analytics for tracking. It loads multiple CSS and JS assets from Tilda's CDN and Google Fonts. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern web fonts. Performance is moderate, with some deferred and async script loading. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic navigation clarity. Hosting is via Tilda's CDN infrastructure. There is opportunity to improve technical SEO and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small hospitality business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lowinebar.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lowinebar.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.