Skip to main content

Security report for lourdesrmc.com

Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Our Lady of Lourdes Health, part of the Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, is a large, well-established non-profit healthcare provider serving the Acadiana region and beyond since 1949. The organization offers a comprehensive range of healthcare services including hospitals, emergency rooms, specialized centers, and primary care, positioning itself as a leading healthcare provider in Louisiana and Mississippi. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content tailored to patients and the community. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Sitecore CMS, and integrates multiple analytics and advertising tools, indicating a moderate to advanced digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible critical vulnerabilities, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms are recommended. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, supporting the organization's strong market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lourdesrmc.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lourdesrmc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
19
Employees
0
Customers
16
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lourdesrmc.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit healthcare system with a broad service portfolio and a large workforce. Its market position is strong in the regional healthcare sector, supported by multiple hospitals and specialty centers. The business model focuses on comprehensive patient care and community health services. The website's integration with partner domains for provider search and health information indicates a well-connected ecosystem. Growth indicators include ongoing facility upgrades and community engagement initiatives. The lack of explicit cookie consent and security disclosure pages suggests areas for compliance improvement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS and asynchronous loading of tracking scripts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which may limit transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The site does not implement a cookie consent mechanism, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, security is adequate but could be enhanced with additional headers and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Include additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System
Description
Our Lady of Lourdes Health has been serving Acadiana since 1949. It is part of the Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, a non-profit Catholic healthcare organization serving Louisiana and Mississippi. The system employs over 2,800 team members and offers a wide range of healthcare services including hospitals, emergency rooms, specialized centers, and primary care.
Key services
Hospital care, Emergency rooms, Cancer care, Heart care, Pediatrics, Women's health, Neurology, Neonatal intensive care, Primary care
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, JsRender, JsViews, Swiper.js, YouTube iframe API, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed credentials
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Bing tracking scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, AddThis
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive healthcare service information is provided.
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  5. Multiple external tracking and advertising scripts are used.
  6. Contact information is present but no contact form detected on this page.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. Privacy policy is present and comprehensive but no explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  9. Site uses Sitecore CMS version 10.2.
  10. SSL is enabled and HTTPS is enforced.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Sitecore CMS version 10.2, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, JsRender, JsViews, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity. It integrates YouTube iframe API for video content and uses Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and rich media content. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from optimization and enhanced security configurations. Hosting details are not explicit but appear to be professionally managed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lourdesrmc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lourdesrmc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.