Skip to main content

Security report for loskolen.dk

Konventum · Hospitality · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Konventum is a Danish hospitality company specializing in conference and meeting facilities, accommodation, and event hosting services. The website targets business customers primarily in Denmark, offering a professional and well-structured digital presence. The company has an established market position supported by a domain age since 2008 and consistent branding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Salient theme, with modern libraries such as jQuery, FontAwesome, and Litepicker enhancing user experience. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching loskolen.dk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
97
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Konventum operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on providing venues and services for conferences and events. Their business model revolves around service provision to corporate clients and organizations. The company benefits from a long-standing domain and consistent branding, indicating stable market presence. The website's integration of marketing tools like Sleeknote and analytics via Google Tag Manager suggests active customer engagement and data-driven marketing strategies. However, the absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the homepage may limit direct customer outreach. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries linked via domain analysis. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on the Danish market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and includes reCAPTCHA scripts to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces domain-level security against DNS spoofing. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are best practices to prevent common web attacks. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by adopting recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  4. Add explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Provide clear and direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers for customer and security communications.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Konventum
Description
Konventum is a hospitality business offering conference and meeting facilities, accommodation, and event hosting services primarily targeting businesses and organizations.
Key services
Conference facilities, Accommodation, Event hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Litepicker, FontAwesome, Select2
Frameworks
Salient WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Sleeknote
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Danish targeting local business customers.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or metadata.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating some privacy compliance.
  5. Contact information is limited to contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins with SEO optimization.
  7. Security best practices partially implemented; room for improvement in headers and DNSSEC.
  8. External scripts include analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Sleeknote.
  9. No visible certifications or security policies published.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Salient theme, supported by popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and FontAwesome for UI enhancements. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, with proper meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for rich snippets. Performance is moderate with some external dependencies on Google Fonts, Facebook scripts, and marketing tools like Sleeknote. Mobile optimization is good with responsive CSS and viewport settings. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better semantic markup. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. Hosting details are limited but domain registrar is a reputable Danish provider. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but has room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with loskolen.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review loskolen.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.