Skip to main content

Security report for loopz.com

Loopz · Healthcare · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Loopz is a specialized SaaS provider offering a collaborative artwork management solution tailored for industries with stringent marketing and regulatory requirements such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and retail. The platform emphasizes workflow streamlining, compliance assurance, and productivity enhancement, supported by certifications like EU GMP and ISO standards. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content including FAQs and customer testimonials. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information could be improved. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a minor concern but does not significantly detract from the site's legitimacy given the professional presentation and certifications. Overall, Loopz presents a trustworthy and well-structured online presence suitable for its target market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching loopz.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention loopz.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for loopz.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Loopz occupies a niche market segment focused on artwork and packaging workflow management for regulated industries. Its competitive advantage lies in its expert-driven development, customization capabilities, and compliance certifications. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with added consulting and support services. Target customers include marketing, legal, logistics, IT, and purchasing teams within pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and retail companies. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals such as client testimonials and industry certifications. Growth potential is supported by continuous product improvement and a clear focus on regulatory compliance. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes integration capabilities with ERP systems.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent management. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers for security or general inquiries may hinder rapid communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a SaaS provider but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting by external researchers.
  4. Provide direct contact information such as a company email or phone number to improve trust and communication channels.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Loopz
Description
Loopz is an end-to-end artwork management SaaS solution developed by experts in graphics and packaging, designed to streamline and secure artwork projects for industries with high marketing and regulatory stakes.
Key services
Artwork workflow management, Automatic proof-reading tools, Collaborative project management, Compliance and regulatory risk mitigation, Integration with ERP systems
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, which is unusual for a business site but not uncommon.
  4. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanism.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  6. Certifications and testimonials enhance trust.
  7. No security.txt or explicit incident response info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements, and integrates Google Tag Manager and CookieHub for analytics and cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible in loading external scripts and images. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but security headers are missing which is a technical debt. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could be enhanced with improved security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with loopz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review loopz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.