Skip to main content

Security report for lohospo.de

Lohosopo - Vertrieb für Ferienunterkünfte und Dmos · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lohospo is a small German company specializing in sales and software solutions for vacation rentals, hotels, and destination management organizations (DMOs). Their website presents a professional image with clear business focus on hospitality sector services including booking software and channel management. The company leverages WordPress with the Divi theme and integrates SEO and analytics tools to support their digital presence. While the technical infrastructure is modern and performance is moderate, the site lacks published privacy and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and anti-spam measures, but could be improved with additional security headers and published policies. Overall, the website is accessible, well-branded, and targets B2B hospitality clients effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lohospo.de

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lohospo.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
1
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-07-30 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lohospo.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –hilfe.lohospo.de2025-07-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche hospitality market, providing sales and software services to vacation rental owners and DMOs. Their business model is B2B focused, leveraging partnerships and channel management technology. The presence on multiple social media platforms indicates active marketing efforts. The website content and metadata suggest a focus on German-speaking markets. The company appears to be relatively young (founded circa 2020) and small in size, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The use of professional plugins and SEO tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses anti-spam and cookie consent plugins, reflecting awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not publish a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could improve transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page detailing user rights and obligations.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Configure and deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lohosopo - Vertrieb für Ferienunterkünfte und Dmos
Description
Vertrieb für Ferienunterkünfte, Buchungssoftware für Ferienwohnungen, Pensionen, Hotels, Vertriebspartner von DMOs, Channelmanager
Key services
Sales for vacation rentals, Booking software, Channel manager, Partnerships with DMOs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Divi Theme v4.27.4, Yoast SEO plugin, Borlabs Cookie plugin, CleanTalk Anti-Spam plugin, Google Analytics (via MonsterInsights), Freshdesk Support plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with SSL
  • Use of anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), Borlabs Cookie (consent management)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme and common plugins for SEO, analytics, and cookie consent.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the homepage or linked in metadata.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin with consent mechanism active.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence is established with Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Pinterest links.
  6. Google Analytics is integrated with anonymized IP and consent management.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Website content is professional and targeted at hospitality sector businesses.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. It uses modern web fonts from Google Fonts and integrates SEO via Yoast and analytics via Google Analytics through MonsterInsights. Cookie consent is managed by Borlabs Cookie, indicating compliance efforts. Hosting is likely provided by 1&1 IONOS based on nameservers. Performance is moderate with standard plugin usage. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lohospo.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lohospo.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.