Skip to main content

Security report for lohmann-rauscher.com

L&R USA Inc. · Healthcare · United States

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lohmann & Rauscher USA Inc. is a prominent international supplier specializing in medical devices and hygiene products, targeting healthcare professionals and patients. The company offers a broad portfolio including compression therapy, wound care, casting materials, and educational items. Their market position is strong, supported by recent acquisitions such as Unisurge International Ltd. and the teledermatology startup OnlineDoctor, indicating active growth and innovation. The website is professionally designed with comprehensive content and clear navigation, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, but performance data is lacking and the site is currently not secured with HTTPS, which is a critical security gap. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of advanced security headers or policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Business credibility is high given the detailed contact information, structured data, and active corporate communications. Overall, the site requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lohmann-rauscher.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
Network security
85
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on medical devices and hygiene products. Their business model centers on manufacturing and global distribution, supported by a strong brand and multiple product lines. Recent acquisitions demonstrate strategic expansion and diversification into digital health. The target customers include healthcare providers and patients requiring advanced wound care and compression therapy solutions. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem, including an online store and digital health platforms. Growth indicators are positive, with active news updates and corporate communications. The website supports these business goals with multilingual support and extensive product information, although technical and security enhancements are needed to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception and trust issues. No advanced security headers such as HSTS are implemented, and no incident response or security policies are publicly available. The site does not employ cookie consent mechanisms, which may impact GDPR compliance. While no known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the absence of TLS protocols and session resumption mechanisms indicates outdated security practices. The company should prioritize securing the website with modern TLS, implement security headers, and publish clear security and incident response policies to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  5. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
L&R USA Inc.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, leveraging Apache server and multiple JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Slider, and Masonry for UI components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site has a comprehensive multilingual setup with hreflang tags for global reach. However, performance metrics are missing, suggesting potential slow load times or lack of monitoring. The absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site is mobile optimized with responsive CSS frameworks but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data. Technical debt includes outdated SSL configuration and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lohmann-rauscher.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lohmann-rauscher.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.