Skip to main content

Security report for logora.com

Logora · Media · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Logora is a French-based company specializing in providing a comprehensive discussion and engagement system tailored for press and media websites. Their platform offers features such as comments, debates, consultations, automatic moderation, and customization, positioning them as a trusted solution for over 100 media references including prominent outlets like Der Spiegel and RTS. The business model is SaaS-based with subscription pricing, targeting media publishers seeking to increase subscriber growth and reader engagement. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, jQuery, and integrates third-party tools like Calendly and Intellimize for marketing and scheduling. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and claims GDPR and DSA compliance, with no cookies stored and automatic moderation services. However, there is a lack of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure information, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trust slightly, though the professional presentation and business information mitigate concerns. Overall, Logora presents a credible and professional online presence with strong business and technical foundations. Strategic enhancements in transparency around security and privacy policies, along with verification of domain registration, would further strengthen their trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logora.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Logora occupies a niche in the media technology sector, offering a specialized engagement platform that enhances reader interaction on press websites. Their competitive advantage lies in the combination of automatic moderation, data ownership, and customization capabilities. The company leverages partnerships with scheduling and presentation platforms to streamline customer onboarding and support. Revenue is likely generated through subscription fees tied to usage and feature sets. The target customers are media publishers and press outlets looking to boost engagement and subscriber numbers. Growth indicators include a diverse client base across multiple countries and languages, and integration with major media brands. The partnership ecosystem includes LinkedIn, Facebook, Calendly, and Pitch, supporting marketing and customer relations. Operationally, the company emphasizes GDPR compliance and data protection, aligning with European regulatory standards.

Security posture

Logora demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and claims of GDPR and DSA compliance. The platform handles sensitive user data responsibly by not storing cookies and providing automatic moderation to maintain content quality. However, the absence of explicit security headers, published security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and formal security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced documentation and security best practices publication to improve stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security controls and governance.
  2. Implement and display a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including contact channels.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Logora
Description
Maximize subscriber growth with our top-rated engagement tool. Drive discussions with automatic moderation and customization. Trusted by +100 media references.
Key services
Discussion system, Moderation services, Comments and debates, Consultations, Email notifications, Customization, Single Sign On integration, Analytics and data ownership
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery, Three.js, Finsweet 3D Globes, Calendly widget, Intellimize, Embedly, YouTube embed
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No cookies stored (per GDPR claim)
  • Automatic moderation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Intellimize, Calendly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  3. Strong GDPR compliance claims but no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Professional and consistent branding with multiple language support.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and integrations.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website carbon footprint badge indicates environmental awareness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using Webflow CMS, enhanced with JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Three.js for interactive features. Integration with third-party services such as Calendly and Intellimize supports marketing automation and customer engagement. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. The use of Google Fonts and CDN-hosted assets contributes to performance. No technical debt or legacy technology was detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logora.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logora.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.