Skip to main content

Security report for logivitrum.lv

Vitrum · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vitrum is a well-established Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing and installation of high-quality PVC and aluminium windows and doors. With over 30 years of experience, they serve both private homeowners and commercial clients, offering energy-efficient, sound-insulating, and durable solutions. Their product portfolio includes sliding systems, fittings, and accessories, supported by a professional team and trusted European partners such as REHAU, Reynaers, and Winkhaus. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, customer testimonials, and multiple contact channels. Technically, the site is built on Webflow, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, cookie consent, and reCAPTCHA integration, though some security headers and incident response details could be enhanced. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Vitrum presents a credible and professional business image with a strong market position in Latvia's real estate and construction sectors.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching logivitrum.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Vitrum operates primarily in the real estate and manufacturing sectors, focusing on windows and doors solutions. Their business model targets both B2C (homeowners) and B2B (construction companies, commercial projects) segments. The company leverages partnerships with leading European profile and fittings manufacturers to maintain high product quality. Their market position is that of a trusted local leader with a 30+ year history, supported by a portfolio of completed projects and positive customer feedback. Revenue streams likely include product sales, installation services, and maintenance contracts. The website ecosystem includes related domains for hospitality and retail equipment, indicating a diversified business group. Growth indicators include recent projects and active marketing efforts via social media and digital channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, which could improve protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing attacks. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contact information limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is solid for a commercial website but could benefit from additional hardening and documented incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify presence of security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance Content Security Policy (CSP) to restrict resource loading and mitigate XSS risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vitrum
Description
Piedāvājam augstas kvalitātes PVC un alumīnija logi un durvis, bīdāmās sistēmas terasēm un furnitūru – saņemiet cenas jau šodien!
Key services
PVC and aluminium windows and doors manufacturing, Installation services, Sliding systems for terraces, Accessories and fittings, Maintenance and aftercare
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Barlow), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, iubenda Cookie Solution, Finsweet Attributes, Splide.js slider
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism via iubenda
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, iubenda Cookie Solution
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong presence of trust signals including partner logos and testimonials.
  3. Comprehensive FAQ and detailed product descriptions.
  4. Multiple contact channels including phone, social media, and contact forms.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanisms.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts, Splide.js for sliders, and third-party integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features like focus outlines and semantic HTML. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-hosted sites with external dependencies. The use of iubenda for cookie consent indicates attention to privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring. The site lacks explicit server security headers visible in the HTML source, suggesting potential for improvement in HTTP response configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with logivitrum.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review logivitrum.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.