Skip to main content

Security report for loftandrosegold.lv

Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lofts & Rosegold is a real estate project based in Riga, Latvia, focusing on loft-style residential apartments and commercial business spaces designed for a hygge lifestyle. The website presents a professional and visually appealing interface with clear navigation and relevant content targeted at prospective residents and business tenants. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and integration with popular analytics and tracking services such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as the lack of explicit contact information, suggests gaps in compliance and user trust facilitation. Security posture is moderate with asynchronous script loading but lacks visible security headers and SSL configuration details. Overall, the website is accessible and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching loftandrosegold.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the real estate sector, offering niche loft-style apartments and commercial spaces in Riga's city center. Its market positioning targets customers interested in modern, stylish living spaces with a focus on the hygge lifestyle. The business model revolves around property leasing and sales, with a focus on quality and design. The website's use of call tracking and analytics tools suggests an emphasis on marketing and lead generation. However, the lack of detailed company information, such as legal name or registration details, limits full business transparency. The project appears small-scale and specialized, with no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership with calltracking.lv indicates a marketing collaboration. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with the use of HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded over HTTPS) and asynchronous loading of tracking scripts to reduce performance impact. However, there is no evidence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of visible forms reduces immediate risk from input vulnerabilities, but no explicit secure form handling is observed. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms, which could expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not provided, indicating potential gaps in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Ensure all external scripts and resources are loaded over HTTPS and verify SSL/TLS configurations for best practices.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Establish and disclose an incident response plan and security policy to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Lofts & Rosegold – jauns projekts Rīgas centrā. Dzīvokļi hygge dzīves baudīšanai un iedvesmas telpas biznesam. Uzzini vairāk!
Key services
Residential loft apartments, Commercial business spaces, Real estate leasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Yandex Maps API, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of asynchronous loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (commented out), Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Calltracking.lv
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a real estate project focused on loft-style apartments and commercial spaces in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with some English meta tags.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected in the content.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools including Facebook Pixel and Hotjar.
  6. No visible forms or data collection fields detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  8. WHOIS lookup failed due to query limit; no registrar or domain ownership data available.
  9. Website appears accessible without WAF or security challenge blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies with integration of Yandex Maps API for location services. It employs Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site appears to be custom-built without a common CMS detected. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading but could be improved with better mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and SSL details are not available from the provided data. The site uses video backgrounds and image carousels for visual appeal. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with loftandrosegold.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review loftandrosegold.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.