Skip to main content

Security report for lobstertube.com

Lobster Tube · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lobster Tube is an adult entertainment website offering a vast library of pornographic videos across multiple categories and orientations. The site supports multiple languages and provides both free and premium content, targeting adult users seeking diverse adult video content. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, and is served over HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. Contact options are limited to a web form with no direct emails or phone numbers provided, which may impact user trust. Overall, the site functions well with good design and navigation but requires improvements in privacy compliance and domain legitimacy to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lobstertube.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lobstertube.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
175
Employees
0
Customers
134
Third parties
41
Weak passwords
27%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lobstertube.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector with a business model based on free content supported by advertising and optional premium memberships. Its extensive content library and multilingual support position it as a large player in the adult tube market. The lack of visible company registration or contact details limits transparency, which could affect partnerships and user confidence. The site leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, indicating a focus on user behavior insights and marketing optimization. There is no evidence of certifications or formal security frameworks, suggesting an informal or less regulated operational approach. Strategic growth could benefit from enhanced compliance, clearer business identity, and improved security disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced, protecting data in transit. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options that help mitigate common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of POST method in search forms is a positive security practice. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible cookie consent or privacy policy, potentially exposing the site to regulatory risks such as GDPR non-compliance. Overall, the security posture requires enhancement to meet industry best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is available to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Establish and publish security incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve security culture and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lobster Tube
Description
LobsterTube offers a large collection of pornographic tube videos, boasting millions of videos across various categories and orientations.
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Premium membership options, Search and browse by categories, pornstars, and tags
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome icons, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure search forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult video tube platform with extensive content and multilingual support.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  3. Contact available only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks advanced security headers.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy blocking.
  6. No visible social media or company contact emails.
  7. Site content is accessible without WAF or blocking challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous JavaScript loading, CSS styling, and icon fonts (FontAwesome). Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and supports multiple languages via locale switching. Performance appears moderate with preconnect and DNS-prefetch hints for CDN domains. No CMS or backend technologies are explicitly identified. The absence of advanced security headers and incomplete privacy implementations represent technical debt. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a large content platform but requires improvements in security and privacy technical controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lobstertube.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lobstertube.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.