Skip to main content

Security report for lna.lt

Lna.lt · Media · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lna.lt is a Lithuanian language blog website providing content across various lifestyle and technology topics including automobiles, home equipment, travel, and health. The site targets Lithuanian-speaking users interested in these areas and operates primarily as a content publishing platform likely monetized through advertising or affiliate marketing. The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Blocksy theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-aware technical infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers and privacy compliance features such as privacy and cookie policies. No WHOIS data could be extracted due to query limits, but the domain appears active and legitimate with recent content updates. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lna.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small media/blog entity focused on lifestyle and technology content for a Lithuanian audience. Its business model revolves around content creation and distribution, potentially supported by advertising or affiliate marketing. The site maintains consistent branding and good content quality, positioning itself as a niche local blog. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of explicit business contact information and privacy policies suggests an informal or small-scale operation. Growth indicators include recent and regular content updates. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its diverse topical coverage and localized language content.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site does not display any exposed sensitive data or known vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible cookie consent or privacy policy, which may expose the site to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small blog but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and HSTS.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lna.lt
Description
Lna.lt is a Lithuanian language blog website covering diverse topics including technology, automobiles, home equipment, travel, beauty, and health.
Key services
Blog articles on technology, Automobile advice, Home and equipment tips, Travel and tourism information, Beauty and health content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Perfmatters Lazy Load, Blocksy Theme, jQuery (implied by plugin usage)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Lithuanian language blog with diverse lifestyle and technology content.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or dates extracted.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in main navigation or footer.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Blocksy theme.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and enforced.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  9. Content is well structured with recent posts dated 2024.
  10. No WAF or security challenge detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Blocksy theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized platform. Lazy loading is implemented via the Perfmatters plugin, improving performance. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details are evident. Performance is moderate, with some images showing lazy load errors which could be optimized. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced by addressing missing security and privacy features. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lna.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lna.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.