Skip to main content

Security report for lkb.eu

LKB · Healthcare · Austria

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LKB is a small healthcare-focused company based in Austria, specializing in the supply and distribution of life science and routine medical diagnostics products. The company holds ISO 9001 certification and emphasizes customer and technical support, targeting laboratories and medical diagnostics professionals. The website presents a professional design with clear navigation and relevant content, supporting the company's market position as a trusted supplier in the region. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap 5 and jQuery, hosted on SuperHosting.bg, but lacks HTTPS support and advanced security configurations, which significantly impacts its security posture. The absence of SSL/TLS encryption and security headers exposes the site to risks and undermines user trust. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a privacy policy present but no cookie policy or consent mechanisms. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly displayed, enhancing business credibility. Overall, while the business and website demonstrate professionalism and market relevance, critical security improvements are necessary to protect users and data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lkb.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LKB operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on life science and medical diagnostics equipment supply and services. Its ISO 9001 certification and presence in multiple Balkan countries indicate a stable and quality-focused business model. The company leverages partnerships with recognized scientific brands, enhancing its market position. Revenue streams likely include product sales, technical services, and maintenance contracts. The target audience includes research laboratories, medical institutions, and biotechnology firms. The website's content and structure support these segments, though the lack of advanced digital marketing and analytics tools suggests a conservative digital strategy. The company could benefit from expanding its online presence and implementing stronger privacy and security measures to align with industry standards and regulations.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL/TLS certificate, exposing all data transmissions to interception risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are configured, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. The server uses Apache but lacks modern TLS protocols and cipher suites. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. The contact form collects personal data but lacks visible security assurances or privacy notices. While no critical vulnerabilities like malware or phishing indicators were detected, the lack of encryption and security best practices represents a significant risk to user data and business reputation. Immediate remediation is recommended to implement HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Develop and publish a comprehensive cookie policy and implement a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by appointing a Data Protection Officer or providing clear contact information for data protection inquiries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, and LightSlider, delivering a responsive and visually appealing user experience. Hosting is provided by SuperHosting.bg, with DNS and mail services integrated with Microsoft Outlook protection. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols severely limits security. Performance data is missing, but the page size and resource count are not reported, suggesting potential optimization opportunities. Accessibility and SEO are basic but functional. The absence of CMS indicates a custom or static site approach, which may simplify maintenance but limits dynamic content capabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lkb.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lkb.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.