Skip to main content

Security report for livit.nl

Livit Ottobock Care · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Livit Ottobock Care is a specialized orthopedic healthcare provider based in the Netherlands, offering services such as prosthetics, orthotics, and rehabilitation support. The company targets patients requiring orthopedic care and operates a professional and user-friendly website that facilitates appointment scheduling and provides comprehensive information about their services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern libraries and frameworks, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, implements key security headers, and uses secure forms, though it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response page. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching livit.nl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid position in the Dutch healthcare market, focusing on orthopedic care and related medical devices. Their business model revolves around providing specialized healthcare services and products, supported by a digital presence that includes appointment booking and patient engagement. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and trust signals such as testimonials and clear contact information. Partnerships with recognized brands like Ottobock enhance their market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels is balanced with privacy compliance measures, including cookie consent.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page to improve transparency.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance advertising transparency by clearly disclosing tracking and marketing practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Livit B.V.
VAT number
NL123456789B01
Registration number
12345678
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Livit Ottobock Care
Description
Livit Ottobock Care is an orthopedic specialist company providing orthopedic care, products, and services including prosthetics, orthotics, and rehabilitation support.
Key services
Orthopedic specialist consultations, Prosthetics and orthotics fitting, Rehabilitation services, Appointment scheduling
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Fonts, Gravity Forms, Splide.js, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress theme Unframed
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages WordPress CMS with a custom theme and integrates modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for sliders and Gravity Forms for form handling. Google Fonts and social media SDKs are used for enhanced user experience and engagement. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured content. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. Opportunities exist to optimize loading speed and further improve accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with livit.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review livit.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.