Skip to main content

Security report for livebox.cz

LIVEBOX, a.s. · Media · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

63/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LIVEBOX, a.s. is a Czech-based company specializing in live streaming services, including sports broadcasts, pay-per-view events, and event production. The company targets sports fans, corporate clients, and event organizers, positioning itself as a reliable and experienced streaming service provider with a medium-sized market presence. Their website showcases a professional design with clear navigation and multimedia content highlighting their key services and partnerships. Technically, the site uses ASP.NET Web Forms with Bootstrap and jQuery, integrating analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Smartlook, all managed with user consent mechanisms. Security posture is moderate, with no visible security headers and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies published. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust, but the website content and contact information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the site scores well in content quality and business credibility but could improve in technical security and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

      Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

      What to do: Consider restricting access to RPC or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching livebox.cz

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Email security
83
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LIVEBOX operates in the media and technology sectors, focusing on live streaming and event production. Their business model revolves around providing streaming infrastructure and services for sports leagues, corporate events, and pay-per-view content. The company demonstrates strong partnerships with notable clients and related service providers like Smartcams and LIVEBOX Event Production. Growth indicators include streaming over 5,000 events in 10 years and increasing annual viewer hours. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact details and client logos, supporting trust and credibility. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and security policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, no HTTP security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) are detected in the HTML content, and no published security or incident response policies exist. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is managed with user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header configurations, published security policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website, including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Improve accessibility compliance to enhance user experience for all visitors, including those with disabilities.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LIVEBOX, a.s.
Registration number
262 33 657
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LIVEBOX, a.s.
Description
LIVEBOX provides streaming services including live sports broadcasts, event streaming, pay-per-view solutions, and event production services.
Key services
Live streaming of sports events, Pay-per-view streaming, Event production, Smartcams live video and time-lapse streaming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Frameworks
ASP.NET Web Forms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Smartlook
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented in Czech language.
  4. Contact details are clearly provided with company name, address, phone, and email.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts with consent.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; server headers unknown.
  7. Website uses ASP.NET Web Forms technology with Bootstrap and jQuery.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms technology, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates external libraries such as Font Awesome for icons and includes tracking scripts from Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Smartlook. The site features multimedia content including videos and image carousels, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive layouts and navigation. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with modern frameworks, improved SEO, and stronger security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with livebox.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review livebox.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.