Skip to main content

Security report for litostrojpower.com

Litostroj Power · Energy · Slovenia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Litostroj Power is a European industrial company specializing in hydro turbines, pumps, valves, and automation solutions primarily serving the energy sector. The company emphasizes its long history dating back to 1848 and its membership in the Wikov Group, positioning itself as a reliable and flexible partner for hydro power projects worldwide. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with clear navigation and relevant content focused on their manufacturing and service offerings. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET Web Forms with jQuery and uses Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS, but some technologies like jQuery are outdated, and security headers are missing. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but no explicit privacy policy page was found in the provided content. WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the active website. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching litostrojpower.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector with a focus on hydro power equipment manufacturing and services. Its market position is strengthened by a long operational history and affiliation with the Wikov Group. The business model centers on engineering, manufacturing, refurbishment, and turnkey water-to-wire projects. The target customers are industrial and energy sector clients globally. The website content and structure support a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and trust indicators such as certifications and awards. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of direct contact information on the homepage may impact customer trust and business transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating basic security awareness and privacy compliance efforts. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data also complicates domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory compliance such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy page and ensure it is easily accessible from the homepage to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file and incident response policy with contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Add explicit company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Litostroj Power
Description
Litostroj Power is a European company specializing in the manufacturing and servicing of hydro turbines, pumps, valves, gates, and automation solutions. They provide new installations, refurbishment, modernization, upgrades, and complete water-to-wire projects with worldwide flexibility.
Key services
New Installations, Refurbishment, Modernization and Upgrades, Complete HPP and Water-to-wire projects, In-House Services, Custom made solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Font Awesome 4.5.0, Google Analytics, Typekit Fonts, ASP.NET Web Forms
Frameworks
ASP.NET Web Forms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to hydro power manufacturing and services.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed cookie policy.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML.
  5. No privacy policy page explicitly found in the HTML content but cookie policy and legal disclaimer pages exist.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  8. Website uses older jQuery version (1.10.2) which may have known vulnerabilities.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms technology with client-side scripting primarily using jQuery 1.10.2 and Font Awesome for icons. It loads fonts from Adobe Typekit and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile responsive with a sliding banner and uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts. Performance is moderate with some legacy scripts and no advanced modern frameworks detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags but lacks JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and improved security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with litostrojpower.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review litostrojpower.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.