Skip to main content

Security report for lishiboke.com

利市博客网 · Finance · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

利市博客网 is a Chinese-language blog specializing in sharing practical experience and tutorials related to internet credit payment tools such as Alipay Huabei, WeChat Fenfu, and JD Baitiao. The site provides guides on credit limit increases, risk control removal, and real-time news updates. It targets Chinese users interested in financial knowledge and credit payment strategies. Technically, the site runs on Z-BlogPHP CMS with common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js, hosted by DNSPod, Inc. The website is mobile-optimized and has a moderate performance profile. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. WHOIS data shows inconsistencies with a domain creation date in the future, which raises trust concerns despite the site's ICP license and visible contact information. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but would benefit from improved security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lishiboke.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche content platform focusing on credit payment tools and financial tutorials, serving a Chinese-speaking audience. It leverages content marketing to attract users interested in credit management and payment solutions. The business model appears to be informational with possible monetization through affiliate links or advertising, though no explicit ad networks were detected. The site maintains an ICP license, indicating regulatory compliance in China. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized content on popular Chinese credit payment platforms. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with only a related domain under the same brand. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and multiple categories targeting different credit tools.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Forms are minimal and do not appear to collect sensitive data beyond search queries. No cookie consent or privacy compliance mechanisms are evident. The WHOIS data inconsistency and lack of registrant details reduce trustworthiness. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and improving privacy compliance to align with GDPR and other standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and improve privacy policy to enhance GDPR compliance.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration data consistency and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
利市博客网
Description
利市博客网专注分享支付宝、微信分付、京东白条等互联网信用支付工具实战经验，提供花呗提额攻略、美团月付开通方法、风控解除方案，每日更新真实合法案例解析与平台隐藏福利，助您快速掌握信用消费核心玩法！
Key services
Credit payment tool tutorials, Financial knowledge sharing, Real-time news updates, User agreements and disclaimers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Swiper.js, Prism.js, Z-BlogPHP CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Chinese language blog focused on credit payment tools and financial tutorials.
  2. Content is accessible and well structured with multiple articles and categories.
  3. No WAF or blocking detected; full content available.
  4. WHOIS data shows domain created in future date, inconsistent with site content.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  6. Contact info includes phone number and social media (WeChat, QQ) with interactive UI.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  8. ICP license present indicating compliance with Chinese regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Z-BlogPHP CMS with jQuery 2.2.4, Swiper.js for sliders, and Prism.js for code highlighting. The site uses standard meta tags and Open Graph tags for SEO and social sharing. Hosting is provided by DNSPod, Inc., a known Chinese DNS and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic with no advanced ARIA roles detected. No analytics or tracking services were identified, indicating minimal user tracking. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with some animations and interactive UI elements for contact buttons. Overall, the technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lishiboke.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lishiboke.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.