Skip to main content

Security report for lintecmotores.com.br

Lintec Ind. Com. de Motores e Equip. Movim. Materiais Ltda. · Energy · Brazil

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lintec Motores is a Brazilian company specializing in the manufacturing and distribution of energy generators, including diesel and gasoline models, as well as related equipment such as motobombas and motors. It operates as a subsidiary of Agrale S.A., leveraging the parent company's certification and quality standards to position itself as a provider of cost-effective and robust energy solutions primarily for the Brazilian market. The website serves as a platform for product information, distributor location, and post-sales support, targeting customers seeking reliable energy generation equipment. Technically, the website employs a traditional technology stack including nginx web server, jQuery libraries, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. However, it lacks modern security implementations such as HTTPS, valid SSL certificates, and advanced security headers, which exposes users to potential risks. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but suffers from slow performance and outdated libraries. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and TLS protocols is a critical vulnerability. While the site includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR principles, it lacks explicit terms of service, security policies, and incident response contacts. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Popupsmart, providing users with control over cookie preferences. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires urgent improvements to protect user data and enhance trust. The overall risk assessment indicates a medium risk level due to missing HTTPS and outdated technologies. Strategic recommendations include immediate SSL implementation, upgrading security headers, modernizing the tech stack, and enhancing transparency with clear security and incident response policies to improve user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lintecmotores.com.br

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
60
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lintec operates in the energy sector with a focus on manufacturing generators and related equipment. Its competitive advantage lies in the Agrale certification, which signals quality and reliability. The business model revolves around manufacturing, distribution through a network of dealers, and providing post-sales support including manuals and catalogs. The target customers are industrial and commercial clients in Brazil needing energy generation solutions. The company benefits from its parent company Agrale S.A.'s brand and resources. The website reflects a moderate digital maturity with basic marketing and analytics tools but lacks advanced e-commerce or customer engagement features. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the presence of multiple product lines and distributor support suggests a stable market presence. Partnerships include the parent company and the digital agency that developed the site. Overall, Lintec maintains a focused niche within the energy equipment manufacturing industry in Brazil.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Lintec's website is low due to the absence of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The site does not implement modern TLS protocols or security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, or X-Frame-Options, increasing the risk of various web attacks. Session cookies lack Secure and HttpOnly flags, potentially exposing session hijacking risks. The use of outdated jQuery 1.7.2 may introduce known vulnerabilities. Although privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR-aligned, there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The lack of security.txt or similar mechanisms further reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is inadequate for protecting sensitive user data and maintaining trust, requiring immediate remediation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website immediately.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce secure connections.
  3. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Set Secure and HttpOnly flags on all session cookies to protect against session hijacking.
  6. Develop and publish a clear security policy and incident response plan, including contact information for security issues.
  7. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  8. Optimize website performance and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience and SEO.
  9. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
  10. Enhance transparency by providing terms of service and clearer business information on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LINTEC IND. COM. DE MOTORES E EQUIP. MOVIM. MATERIAIS LTDA.
Registration number
CNPJ 23.001.852/0001-07
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an nginx server with no SSL/TLS support, serving content over HTTP only. The front-end uses legacy jQuery 1.7.2 and jQuery UI 1.8, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA v3 are integrated for analytics and spam protection, respectively. The site uses chunked transfer encoding but lacks performance metrics, indicating possible slow load times. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and cookie consent is managed via Popupsmart. The site does not appear to use a CMS or modern frameworks. The HTML is XHTML 1.0 Transitional with ISO-8859-1 charset, which is outdated compared to modern UTF-8 standards. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated, with significant modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lintecmotores.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lintecmotores.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.