Skip to main content

Security report for linoteka.lv

Linoteka · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Linoteka is a small fashion and design business based in Latvia, specializing in clothing, accessories, and home textiles. The website serves as an e-commerce platform and brand showcase, targeting consumers interested in quality fashion and home textile products. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing its market reach. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form security and Typekit fonts for branding consistency. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communications. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing security headers, indicates gaps in compliance and security best practices. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linoteka.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Linoteka operates in the retail sector with a focus on fashion and home textiles, positioning itself as a niche brand in Latvia. Its business model revolves around direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales supported by a curated online catalog and project showcases. The company leverages social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information on the site suggests a small to medium enterprise scale. The website's clean design and clear navigation support a positive user experience, though the absence of formal policies may impact trust for privacy-conscious customers. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the available data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise protecting form submissions. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness indicators. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also reflects compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is basic and could be improved with standard web security practices and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add terms of service and incident response contact information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Linoteka
Description
Linoteka is a fashion and design business focused on clothing, accessories, and home textiles. The website showcases collections and projects related to these sectors.
Key services
Clothing, Accessories, Home textile products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Typekit fonts, JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise used on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with standard e-commerce features.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise is implemented for form security.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML response.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  9. Newsletter subscription form collects email addresses.
  10. No signs of adult or explicit content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, a popular CMS and hosting platform, which provides a stable and secure infrastructure. The use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise indicates attention to form security. The site loads multiple JavaScript and CSS assets from Squarespace and Typekit, ensuring consistent branding and functionality. Performance is moderate, with images optimized for various resolutions and mobile responsiveness enabled. However, the absence of advanced SEO and accessibility features suggests room for technical improvement. No custom backend or complex frameworks are detected, indicating low technical debt but also limited customization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small e-commerce site but could benefit from enhancements in security and compliance tooling.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linoteka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linoteka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.