Skip to main content

Security report for linegrouplimited.com

Line Group Limited · Finance · Gibraltar

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Line Group Limited is a Gibraltar-based fiduciary services provider specializing in international fiduciary, company management, trust, accounting, and corporate banking services. Established in 2012, the company serves a global clientele with a strong local presence and a team of approximately 70 professionals. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive presentation of their services and team, targeting clients seeking wealth management, trust services, and corporate solutions in Gibraltar. The business model focuses on providing tailored fiduciary and corporate services with a strong emphasis on trust and compliance. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript frameworks including Vue.js, Alpine.js, and jQuery, complemented by SEO optimization through Yoast. The site uses Google Analytics and Passle for content marketing and analytics. Hosting appears to be managed via GoDaddy, consistent with the domain registrar. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain status protections. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with solid business credibility and technical implementation. Security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers and policies. The domain registration data supports the legitimacy of the business. Strategic recommendations include improving DNS security, publishing security policies, and ongoing monitoring of third-party scripts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching linegrouplimited.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Line Group Limited occupies a niche in the Gibraltar financial services sector, focusing on fiduciary and trust services, corporate banking, and company incorporation. Their competitive advantage lies in their established local presence combined with international reach and a comprehensive service portfolio. The company targets high-net-worth individuals, families, and corporate clients seeking wealth management and fiduciary solutions. Revenue streams likely derive from service fees across accounting, trust management, corporate services, and banking facilitation. The firm maintains a partnership ecosystem with legal firms such as Hassans, as indicated by joint charitable initiatives. Growth indicators include a stable team size and active content marketing through insights and news. The company’s operations are supported by a professional website that facilitates client engagement and lead generation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited in DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate awareness of GDPR compliance. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhancements in DNS security, HTTP headers, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Line Group Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Line Group Limited
Description
Line Group is a renowned Gibraltar-based provider of international fiduciary services, company administration and trust management services.
Key services
Accounting Services, Corporate Banking, Corporate Services, Family Office Services, Gibraltar Company Incorporation, QROPS, Trust Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Vue.js, Alpine.js, Swiper.js, Google Analytics, Passle
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags set
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Passle
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. Clear contact information and multiple contact forms present.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and SEO tools.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with modern JavaScript frameworks including Vue.js and Alpine.js, providing dynamic and interactive user experiences. SEO is managed via the Yoast plugin, ensuring good metadata and structured data implementation. The site uses Swiper.js for sliders and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Hosting and domain registration are managed through GoDaddy, with domain status flags set to prevent unauthorized changes. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface. The site’s technical debt appears low, but ongoing modernization and security hardening are recommended to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with linegrouplimited.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review linegrouplimited.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.