Skip to main content

Security report for lindenhofgruppe.ch

Lindenhofgruppe AG · Healthcare · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindenhofgruppe AG is a large healthcare provider based in Bern, Switzerland, offering comprehensive and interdisciplinary basic care with approximately 2500 employees across three locations. The website presents detailed information about their medical specialties, patient services, family support, and career opportunities, positioning them as a well-established regional healthcare institution. Technically, the site is built on Weblication® CMS and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The website uses HTTPS with good security headers and secure forms, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but improvements in transparency and compliance documentation are recommended. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, supporting the legitimacy of the website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindenhofgruppe.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lindenhofgruppe.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lindenhofgruppe.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Lindenhofgruppe operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on hospital and outpatient care, specialized medical centers, and educational programs for patients and families. Their business model revolves around providing medical services and training, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and job seekers in the Bern region. The website indicates a strong market position with a broad range of specialties and centers, including oncology, cardiology, and neonatology. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like Scholl Communications AG for CMS solutions. Growth indicators include active job postings and educational offerings. The absence of explicit privacy and security policies suggests an area for strategic improvement to enhance trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced, presence of security headers, and secure form handling with CSRF tokens. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used, which increases the attack surface but no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of published security policies and incident response contacts is a compliance gap. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation to improve incident response readiness and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking technologies.
  3. Develop and publish security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting issues.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and remove any unnecessary tracking to reduce risk.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindenhofgruppe AG
Description
Mit rund 2500 Mitarbeitenden an drei Standorten erbringt die Lindenhofgruppe eine umfassende und interdisziplinäre Grundversorgung in Bern.
Key services
Hospital care, Specialized medical treatments, Patient and family support, Educational courses, Career and training opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Weblication® CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is comprehensive for healthcare services and patient information
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on main pages
  4. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are used without visible consent banners
  5. Contact information is present but no direct emails found in HTML
  6. No security or incident response policies published
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Weblication® CMS, a specialized content management system, and integrates modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and security headers. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and multiple scripts, but mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site includes secure forms with CSRF tokens but lacks structured data like JSON-LD for enhanced SEO and rich results. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible consent management, which could pose privacy and compliance challenges.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindenhofgruppe.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindenhofgruppe.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.