Lindenhofgruppe AG is a large healthcare provider based in Bern, Switzerland, offering comprehensive and interdisciplinary basic care with approximately 2500 employees across three locations. The website presents detailed information about their medical specialties, patient services, family support, and career opportunities, positioning them as a well-established regional healthcare institution. Technically, the site is built on Weblication® CMS and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The website uses HTTPS with good security headers and secure forms, but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but improvements in transparency and compliance documentation are recommended. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, supporting the legitimacy of the website.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention lindenhofgruppe.ch, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for lindenhofgruppe.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The Lindenhofgruppe operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on hospital and outpatient care, specialized medical centers, and educational programs for patients and families. Their business model revolves around providing medical services and training, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and job seekers in the Bern region. The website indicates a strong market position with a broad range of specialties and centers, including oncology, cardiology, and neonatology. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like Scholl Communications AG for CMS solutions. Growth indicators include active job postings and educational offerings. The absence of explicit privacy and security policies suggests an area for strategic improvement to enhance trust and compliance.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced, presence of security headers, and secure form handling with CSRF tokens. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used, which increases the attack surface but no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of published security policies and incident response contacts is a compliance gap. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation to improve incident response readiness and user trust.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking technologies.
Develop and publish security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting issues.
Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and remove any unnecessary tracking to reduce risk.
Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Lindenhofgruppe AG
Description
Mit rund 2500 Mitarbeitenden an drei Standorten erbringt die Lindenhofgruppe eine umfassende und interdisziplinäre Grundversorgung in Bern.
Key services
Hospital care, Specialized medical treatments, Patient and family support, Educational courses, Career and training opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Weblication® CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of Google Tag Manager with consent mode
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Secure forms with CSRF tokens
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed and well-structured
Content is comprehensive for healthcare services and patient information
No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on main pages
Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are used without visible consent banners
Contact information is present but no direct emails found in HTML
No security or incident response policies published
WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built using Weblication® CMS, a specialized content management system, and integrates modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, TikTok Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and security headers. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and multiple scripts, but mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site includes secure forms with CSRF tokens but lacks structured data like JSON-LD for enhanced SEO and rich results. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible consent management, which could pose privacy and compliance challenges.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with lindenhofgruppe.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindenhofgruppe.ch.