Skip to main content

Security report for lindaremedical.co.uk

Lindare Medical · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lindare Medical is a UK-based company specializing in innovative spinal surgery solutions, positioning itself as a leading provider of advanced spinal equipment. The website reflects a professional B2B medical equipment supplier targeting healthcare professionals and institutions within the UK. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and the Avada theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with good SEO practices but lacking in advanced security configurations. Security posture is moderate with no HTTPS or security headers explicitly confirmed and absence of privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to registration errors, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website content. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires improvements in security, compliance, and domain registration verification to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lindaremedical.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on spinal surgery equipment, serving a specialized market segment in the UK. Its business model is primarily B2B, supplying advanced medical devices. The website content and metadata suggest a strong market position as a leading provider, although no explicit certifications or trust badges are displayed. The company leverages social media integration via Facebook and uses SEO tools like Yoast to enhance visibility. The absence of detailed contact information and compliance policies may limit customer trust and regulatory adherence. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided. The business appears to be small-sized with a focused niche offering.

Security posture

The website lacks visible security headers and explicit HTTPS enforcement confirmation, which are essential for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The WordPress version and plugins appear outdated, potentially exposing the site to vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages are found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, indicating limited security transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. While no explicit vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the domain registration issues and missing security best practices reduce the overall security posture. Regular updates, security hardening, and policy publication are recommended to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and correct domain registration details with Nominet UK to ensure legitimacy and avoid future disruptions.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  3. Add and maintain comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  6. Publish security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  7. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and remediate risks.
  8. Enhance contact information visibility including verified company emails and phone numbers for better customer engagement.
  9. Improve accessibility features and mobile optimization to enhance user experience across devices.
  10. Consider adding trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or accreditations to strengthen market credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lindare Medical
Description
Lindare Medical are the leading provider of solutions for spinal surgery in the UK. We provide equipment that is streets ahead of the competition in terms of
Key services
Spinal surgery equipment supply, Innovative spinal solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, WooCommerce 3.6.7, jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery Migrate 1.4.1, Yoast SEO plugin 4.8, Fusion Core plugin, Avada Theme 5.4.2
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration error
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce and Avada theme
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content
  6. Facebook SDK is loaded indicating some social media integration
  7. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are properly configured
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt found
  10. Content is focused on spinal surgery equipment and medical solutions
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an older WordPress version (4.9.26) with WooCommerce 3.6.7 and the Avada theme 5.4.2, indicating potential technical debt and security risks. The tech stack includes jQuery 1.12.4 and related plugins, some of which may be outdated. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin, and social media integration is present via Facebook SDK. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. No hosting provider or CDN information is evident from the data. The site uses standard web technologies but would benefit from modernization, including upgrading to current CMS versions, improving security configurations, and enhancing performance and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lindaremedical.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lindaremedical.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.