Skip to main content

Security report for limbazuslimnica.lv

Limbažu slimnīca SIA · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Limbažu slimnīca SIA operates as a local healthcare provider in Limbaži, Latvia, offering medical services primarily through its polyclinic facilities. The website content indicates involvement in projects such as improving energy efficiency of their healthcare buildings, reflecting a commitment to sustainable operations. The target audience is local residents seeking healthcare services. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on healthcare delivery within the community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Nicepage plugin and jQuery, providing a basic but functional digital presence with moderate mobile optimization and SEO. Security posture is limited, with no detected security headers or advanced protections, and privacy compliance is minimal due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is safe and appropriate for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching limbazuslimnica.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention limbazuslimnica.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for limbazuslimnica.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a small, essential healthcare provider serving the Limbaži region. Its competitive advantage lies in local presence and community healthcare services. Revenue streams likely come from healthcare services and government or municipal funding. The website does not reveal partnerships or subsidiaries, indicating a focused local operation. Growth indicators include infrastructure projects such as energy efficiency upgrades. The lack of detailed business information and contact data on the website suggests room for improvement in transparency and customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The use of WP Statistics suggests some level of user tracking without clear privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security culture appears minimal, with no explicit security best practices communicated to users.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Include clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information and ensure domain registration details are publicly accessible to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Limbažu slimnīca SIA
Description
SIA “LIMBAŽU SLIMNĪCA” is engaged in healthcare services, including projects to improve energy efficiency of their polyclinic building located at Klostera ielā 6A, Limbaži.
Key services
Healthcare services, Polyclinic operations, Energy efficiency projects for healthcare facilities
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Nicepage plugin, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
WP Statistics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with Nicepage plugin and jQuery.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. No social media links or security policy documents detected.
  7. Content is healthcare related, safe for general audiences.
  8. Basic design and content quality with moderate branding consistency.
  9. No security headers or advanced security practices detected in the HTML content.
  10. Uses WP Statistics for analytics, but no privacy compliance details.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform with the Nicepage plugin and jQuery library, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and local plugin assets. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags present. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries beyond jQuery. Accessibility features are basic, and no ARIA roles or enhanced accessibility markup were detected. The site lacks advanced security configurations and does not appear to use a CDN or specialized hosting provider based on the HTML content. Technical debt may exist due to reliance on older libraries and absence of security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with limbazuslimnica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review limbazuslimnica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.