Skip to main content

Security report for lilliputhealth.co.uk

Lilliput Health · Healthcare · United Kingdom

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lilliput Health is a well-established private healthcare clinic in the UK specializing in musculoskeletal treatments such as chiropractic, physiotherapy, sports massage, and podiatry. The business operates multiple clinic locations and offers a broad range of therapies targeting individuals seeking private healthcare services. The website demonstrates a solid market position with over 19 years of experience and strong customer trust signals, including high ratings on third-party review platforms. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, optimized for SEO and mobile use. Security posture is good with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a domain registration error, which is unusual but does not detract from the website's professional appearance and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is credible and functional with room for technical and security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lilliputhealth.co.uk

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets private healthcare consumers in the UK, focusing on musculoskeletal and related therapies. It leverages partnerships with Total Therapy and integrates customer review platforms to enhance credibility. The business model is direct patient service provision with multiple physical locations. The website content and structured data indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand and professional presentation. Growth indicators include multiple practitioners and therapy offerings, as well as active marketing and analytics usage. The partnership ecosystem includes Total Therapy and Trustist, supporting service quality and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form to prevent spam. Consent mechanisms for data collection are present, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the site lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with good baseline protections but opportunities for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear terms of service and security policy page to improve legal and security transparency.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lilliput Health
Description
Lilliput Health is a highly acclaimed private healthcare clinic offering a wide variety of treatments including Chiropractic, Physiotherapy, Sports Massage, Podiatry and more.
Key services
Chiropractic, Physiotherapy, Sports Massage & Deep Tissue Massage, Podiatry and Foot Health, Colon Hydrotherapy, Sports Therapy, Shockwave Therapy, Mummy MOT, Women’s Health Physiotherapy, Clinical Nutrition
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Gravity Forms, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Yandex Metrika, Trustist widget, Zendesk Web Widget, jQuery
Frameworks
Yoast SEO Premium
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Consent checkbox on contact form for data collection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Hotjar, Trustist
Marketing tools
Trustist Ratings Widget, Zendesk Chat Widget
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service offerings.
  2. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  3. Multiple locations and practitioner profiles indicate a well-established business.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with consent mechanisms.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration error, which is a concern but does not align with website professionalism.
  6. No evidence of security incidents or vulnerabilities in the visible content.
  7. No explicit privacy or security policy beyond GDPR-compliant privacy policy found.
  8. No terms of service or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder and Gravity Forms, integrating multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Yandex Metrika. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and local business information, improving search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. The site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with some scope for performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lilliputhealth.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lilliputhealth.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.