Skip to main content

Security report for lilletourism.com

Office de Tourisme de Lille · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.lilletourism.com serves as the official online presence of the Office de Tourisme de Lille, providing comprehensive tourism information, cultural insights, and online booking services for visitors to Lille, France. It targets tourists and visitors interested in exploring Lille's heritage, events, gastronomy, and shopping. The site is multilingual, supporting French, English, and Dutch, enhancing accessibility for international visitors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a custom Woody theme and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and modules to deliver a rich, responsive user experience. Accessibility and SEO best practices are well implemented, contributing to excellent content quality and navigation clarity. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent frameworks but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data is notable but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given its professional presentation and official branding. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure suitable for its role in tourism promotion, with recommendations to enhance privacy transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lilletourism.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lilletourism.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
42
Employees
0
Customers
42
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lilletourism.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Office de Tourisme de Lille operates as a medium-sized entity within the hospitality sector, focusing on tourism promotion and visitor services. Its business model revolves around providing information, facilitating online reservations for city passes, tours, and activities, and offering souvenirs through an online shop. The organization maintains partnerships with reservation platforms and regional attractiveness agencies, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The website's multilingual support and rich content suggest a strategic focus on attracting diverse international visitors. While direct revenue streams are not explicit, the integration with booking services implies transactional capabilities. The lack of visible contact details and corporate registration information online suggests a focus on user-facing services rather than direct corporate marketing. Growth indicators include recent content updates and active event promotion. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing transparency around privacy and security to bolster trust further.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicates potential gaps in compliance and readiness. Data protection practices appear basic, with no visible data protection officer contact or vulnerability disclosure program. The security culture seems focused on user privacy through consent but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated but not fully documented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public tourism website but requires improvements to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently linked on the website.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including an incident response or abuse email address.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection by appointing and listing a Data Protection Officer or contact point.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Office de Tourisme de Lille
Description
L’Office de Tourisme de Lille vous présente le patrimoine de Lille et grâce à sa centrale de réservation, réservez en ligne et sans frais votre séjour à Lille.
Key services
Tourism information, Online booking for city passes, visits, and activities, Souvenir and gift shop
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, jQuery 3.7.1, Highcharts 12.1.2, Swiper.js, Flatpickr, NoUISlider, Lazysizes, Moment.js with locales and timezone, js.cookie, Rellax, iframeResizer, Plyr
Frameworks
Woody CMS (custom theme and addons), WordPress (implied by wp-json endpoints)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent framework for cookies
  • Accessibility features implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Consent Framework
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, multilingual, and professionally presented.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Privacy policy page not found or not linked visibly.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active domain.
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript modules and libraries.
  9. SEO and accessibility features are well implemented.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and extensive use of modern JavaScript ES modules and libraries, including jQuery, Highcharts, Swiper, Flatpickr, and others, indicating a modern and modular front-end architecture. The site uses lazy loading for images and supports multiple languages, enhancing performance and accessibility. Hosting appears to leverage CDN services (woody.cloudly.space) for static assets and APIs, contributing to moderate to good performance. Accessibility features such as adjustable contrast, dyslexia-friendly fonts, and line spacing controls are implemented, reflecting a commitment to inclusive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and privacy documentation suggests areas for modernization and compliance improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and well-suited for a tourism information platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lilletourism.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lilletourism.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.