Skip to main content

Security report for lilaste.eu

sia "Vasaras Atpūtas Multipleks" · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lilaste.eu represents a small Latvian hospitality business named sia "Vasaras Atpūtas Multipleks" offering leisure and sport fishing services combined with affordable hotel accommodation near Riga. The business targets families and tourists seeking water-based recreation, fishing, and relaxation with amenities such as banquet halls and quality rooms. The website integrates a third-party booking widget and uses common analytics tools like Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika. While the site provides clear contact information and business registration details, it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Technically, the site uses legacy technologies like jQuery and loads some scripts over HTTP, creating mixed content risks. Security headers are absent, and no incident response or security policies are published, indicating a moderate security posture. Overall, the website is functional and moderately trustworthy but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lilaste.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on leisure and sport fishing tourism near Riga, Latvia. It leverages a business model combining hotel services with sport fishing and recreational activities, targeting local and regional tourists. The company appears small in size with a local market position, offering competitive pricing and a range of amenities. The website content and business registration data are consistent, enhancing credibility. The use of third-party booking and analytics services indicates some digital maturity, though the absence of privacy policies and security best practices suggests room for growth. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS but suffers from mixed content issues due to HTTP-loaded scripts, which can expose users to man-in-the-middle attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, reducing protection against common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. Analytics and tracking scripts are present, implying moderate user tracking without clear user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires significant improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Serve all external scripts and resources over HTTPS to eliminate mixed content vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
sia "Vasaras Atpūtas Multipleks"
Registration number
LV40003677338
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
sia "Vasaras Atpūtas Multipleks"
Description
Atpūtas komplekss Lilaste apvieno kvalitatīvu viesnīcu servisu ar tūrisma bāzes pakalpojumiem, piedāvājot divzvaigžņu viesnīcas servisu par demokrātiskām cenām un sporta atpūtas bāzes pakalpojumus. Kompleksā ir viesnīcas numuri ar televizoru, internetu, ozolkoka gultām, tualeti un dušas kabīni. Piedāvā makšķerēšanu, atpūtu uz ūdens, pludmali, banketu zāli, labu virtuvi un citas aktivitātes. Atrodas 25 minūšu braucienā no Rīgas centra, tuvumā jūra un ezers.
Key services
hotel accommodation, sport fishing, banquet hall, beach access, water recreation, restaurant services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, BookVisit booking widget, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://lilaste.eu/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, WebVisor
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Top.Lv, Puls.lv, Openstat
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, WebVisor, Amung.us
Marketing tools
Yandex Share, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small hospitality business focused on leisure and sport fishing near Riga, Latvia.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Booking functionality is integrated via third-party BookVisit widget.
  4. Some external scripts loaded over HTTP, posing mixed content risks.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  6. Multiple analytics and advertising scripts are used, with moderate user tracking.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  8. No security or incident response policies are published.
  9. Website content is in Latvian with multi-language options.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a technology stack including jQuery, Fancybox, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, and a third-party booking widget from BookVisit. The site loads some scripts over insecure HTTP, which is a technical risk. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph. The site design is functional but basic, with moderate branding consistency. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but would benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lilaste.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lilaste.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.