Skip to main content

Security report for likor.lv

Likor · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Likor is a well-established Latvian optics company operating since 1993, specializing in the manufacturing of eyeglass lenses and wholesale distribution of optical products across the Baltic region. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a clear focus on optical products including contact lenses and protective eyewear. The company maintains partnerships with reputable industry brands such as Shamir and CooperVision, indicating a solid market position. Technically, the website uses common frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience, though SEO and accessibility could be improved. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or explicit policies, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Contact information is clearly presented, but privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching likor.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Likor operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors of the optical industry, targeting opticians, optical retailers, and end consumers in the Baltics. Their business model combines product manufacturing with wholesale distribution, leveraging partnerships with international optical brands to strengthen their offering. The company’s longevity since 1993 suggests stable operations and market experience. The website content and partner logos reinforce credibility, though the absence of detailed corporate registration data and privacy policies may impact trust. The company appears focused on quality and personalized optical solutions, positioning itself as a key regional player in eyewear manufacturing and distribution.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no detected HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were identified, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting the company’s readiness to handle security incidents. The absence of WHOIS transparency further reduces trust. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strict transport security (HSTS) to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Deploy standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish incident response and abuse contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Likor
Description
Stabils optikas preču nozares uzņēmums Baltijas valstīs kopš 1993. gada, specializējas briļļu lēcu ražošanā un optikas preču vairumtirdzniecībā.
Key services
Briļļu lēcu ražošana, Optikas preču vairumtirdzniecība, Kontaktlēcu piegāde
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Slick Slider, Popper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected from provided scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Website uses common web technologies and libraries but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features.
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies present.
  7. Partner logos and external links indicate established industry relationships.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack including jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Slick Slider for UI components and responsiveness. The HTML structure is valid with responsive design elements, supporting good mobile usability. However, SEO metadata is minimal with empty title and description tags, limiting search engine visibility. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Accessibility features are basic, and no analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in SEO, accessibility, and security implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with likor.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review likor.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.