Skip to main content

Security report for ligence.io

UAB LIGENCE · Healthcare · Lithuania

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ligence.io is the official website of UAB LIGENCE, a Lithuanian company founded in 2019 specializing in echocardiography software that automates 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) analysis and reporting. The software aims to improve accuracy and reduce operator variability, enhancing patient follow-up care. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with Elementor and optimized for SEO and mobile devices. It integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Hotjar, alongside privacy compliance mechanisms including GDPR-compliant cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence for a specialized healthcare technology provider.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ligence.io

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ligence.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
1
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2025-04-15 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ligence.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –us.ligence.io2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets healthcare professionals and cardiologists with a niche software product that automates echocardiography workflows. Its business model revolves around software licensing or subscription for medical imaging post-processing. The website content and structure indicate a small but focused enterprise with a clear market position in healthcare technology. The presence of certifications and privacy compliance enhances trust. The company leverages LinkedIn for marketing and maintains a professional online presence with multiple resources and contact options, though direct phone or physical address details are not prominently displayed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS, spam protection via Google reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent management. However, it lacks explicit security policy documentation and incident response contacts. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not clearly implemented, which could be improved to harden the site against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain registration is consistent and secure with prohibitions on deletion and transfer, supporting legitimacy.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB LIGENCE
Description
Echocardiography software automating 2D TTE analysis and reporting in post-processing. The software maintains consistent accuracy while removing inter- and intra-operator variability, leading to improved follow-up care and a reduced need for additional tests.
Key services
2D TTE analysis automation, Echocardiography reporting, Post-processing software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, CookieYes cookie consent, PixelYourSite
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and Yoast SEO plugin
  2. Strong focus on privacy compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy
  3. Multiple demo request forms with Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration to prevent spam
  4. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses on homepage; contact primarily via forms and email
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. Use of LinkedIn and Google marketing and analytics tools
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. Website content is professional and targeted at healthcare professionals
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for optimization. It employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security and integrates Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Hotjar for analytics and marketing. The site uses CookieYes for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS parking is used. The technical stack is current and supports a professional healthcare software business, though some security hardening and accessibility improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ligence.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ligence.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.