Skip to main content

Security report for liepupesmuiza.lv

Lielupes muiža · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liepupes Muiža is a hospitality business located in Latvia offering hotel accommodations, restaurant services, spa and pool facilities, and event hosting such as weddings and seminars. The website presents a professional and visually appealing digital presence built on WordPress with Bootstrap framework, featuring a cookie consent mechanism and multiple language options. The business targets tourists and event organizers seeking a culturally rich and historic venue experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and user enumeration protection, though additional security headers and a published privacy policy would enhance compliance and trust. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy for its hospitality market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liepupesmuiza.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on regional tourism and event services. It leverages its historic manor setting as a unique selling point. The business model centers on accommodation, dining, wellness, and event hosting. The presence of certifications like Hotelstars EU and local tourism association logos supports credibility. The website's multilingual support and booking links indicate a customer-centric approach. No direct e-commerce or affiliate programs were detected. The company appears small-sized with a niche market position in Latvia.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. A WordPress plugin protects against user enumeration attacks. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The security score is good but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding analytics privacy disclosures and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lielupes muiža
Description
Liepupes muiža is a historic manor offering hospitality services including hotel accommodation, restaurant, spa, event hosting such as weddings and seminars, and a newly built pool center. It is positioned as a place to experience past traditions and memorable moments in Latvia.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Restaurant, Spa and pool facilities, Event hosting (weddings, banquets, seminars)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 5, GLightbox, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • User enumeration protection plugin active

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories but no cookies currently displayed.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with multiple phone numbers and emails.
  5. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and common plugins.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML source; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No forms detected on the main page; contact likely via email or phone.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and GLightbox for media display. It uses a cookie consent plugin with detailed categories but currently no cookies are displayed. External resources include Google Fonts, CDNJS, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and consistent branding. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA landmarks and improved keyboard navigation. No hosting provider information was found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security and privacy improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liepupesmuiza.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liepupesmuiza.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.