Skip to main content

Security report for liepajasslimnica.lv

SIA "Liepājas reģionālā slimnīca" · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Liepājas Reģionālā slimnīca is a prominent healthcare provider in Latvia, serving as the largest multidisciplinary hospital in the Kurzeme region. The institution offers a broad spectrum of medical services including emergency care, inpatient and outpatient treatments, and specialized paid services. It also functions as a practical training base for new medical specialists and supports resident education. The website reflects a professional healthcare organization with clear contact information, privacy and cookie policies, and a user-friendly design optimized for mobile devices. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Vue.js and jQuery, hosted likely on a CMS platform (October CMS), with good performance and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though the absence of explicit security headers suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust verification, but the website content and domain name strongly indicate a legitimate healthcare entity. Overall, the site is well-structured, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching liepajasslimnica.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospital holds a leading market position in the Kurzeme region as the largest multidisciplinary healthcare provider, catering to a wide patient base with emergency, inpatient, and outpatient services. Its business model revolves around public and private healthcare delivery, including paid services and medical education. The organization benefits from a strong local presence, partnerships with regional transport and booking services, and active community engagement through news and updates. The website content and structure suggest a mature organization focused on quality healthcare delivery and patient satisfaction. No direct revenue streams or parent company information are disclosed, indicating an independent entity. The presence of social media and public procurement information reflects transparency and community integration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site does not display any incident response or security contact information, which is a gap in security governance. No signs of malware, phishing, or other malicious activity were found. The security score is good but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing a security policy. The lack of WHOIS data prevents verification of domain registration legitimacy, which is a minor risk factor.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance SEO by adding comprehensive meta tags and structured data for better search engine visibility.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and data protection officer contact details to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Liepājas reģionālā slimnīca"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Liepājas reģionālā slimnīca"
Description
Liepājas Reģionālā slimnīca is the largest multidisciplinary medical institution in Kurzeme, Latvia, providing emergency medical assistance, inpatient and outpatient services, and a wide range of paid medical services. It also serves as a practical training base for new specialists and participates in resident doctor education.
Key services
Emergency medical assistance, Inpatient services, Outpatient services, Medical consultations, Physiotherapy and rehabilitation, Paid medical services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Google Fonts (Roboto), Swiper slider, Bootstrap (dropdowns and grid classes), Cookie Consent plugin
Frameworks
Vue.js, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML source; recommend adding for improved security.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating good privacy posture.
  7. Website uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile optimized.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No terms of service or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Vue.js for frontend interactivity, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Google Fonts for typography. The presence of October CMS framework files suggests a robust CMS backend. The site uses responsive design principles with Bootstrap components ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance is moderate with prefetching of CSS and JS assets, though no explicit performance optimization tools were detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and limited SEO metadata are areas for improvement. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with liepajasslimnica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review liepajasslimnica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.